WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.100 --> 00:00:16.340
[upbeat music] Welcome back to Tasteland. I am Francis Zeier. And I'm still Daisy Alioto. Somehow af- [laughs] after all these years. Uh, Daisy, who are we speaking with today?

2
00:00:16.980 --> 00:00:23.910
Today we're speaking with Dina Yago. She's an artist, writer, and a founding member of the trend forecasting group K-Hole.

3
00:00:24.420 --> 00:00:31.850
She currently works at Cosmos, and I'm so excited to learn more about what they're doing with artists and creatives.

4
00:00:33.250 --> 00:00:46.210
Um, it's been compared to Pinterest, but I think what they're doing is really different and innovative, and I don't think that they think of themselves as just another mood boarding app, I'll say that much. Yeah.

5
00:00:46.280 --> 00:00:56.560
So I'm really interested to find out from her what's on the cutting edge there. So I'm doing a little dry January. Love a dry January, but as part of that- [laughs]... I also deleted the Twitter app from my phone.

6
00:00:57.120 --> 00:01:04.810
That's... Well, are you logging in on Safari Daisy Alioto style? No. No. I, I, I've, I've... That's... No, but, I mean, I'm on my computer all day- Yeah... so I'm just looking at it on my computer.

7
00:01:04.810 --> 00:01:16.420
Well, we're on day what? Six? We'll see what happens. Dry January. So w- I, I probably will inadvertently have a pretty dry January. I am sort of like- I feel like you're drier than I am in your daily life anyways.

8
00:01:16.480 --> 00:01:30.820
Well, I don't live in the city, so I don't go out as much. Um, we don't keep alcohol at our home 'cause my husband's sober. So that's part of it, but I did, um... Kat sent me an extremely innovative Christmas present.

9
00:01:31.060 --> 00:01:42.810
Um, she's always been an amazing gift giver. She sent me a carton, not a carton, yeah, a car- what is... Just a single box of cigarettes. This is, I'm revealing myself as only a social smoker, casual smoker.

10
00:01:42.820 --> 00:01:50.720
[laughs] Yeah, a carton. So 20 cigarettes she sent you? No. What? How many- 'Cause-... are in a pack? A pack. 20. That's right. A pack. A pack. Yeah, that's 20 cigarettes. It's a pack.

11
00:01:50.780 --> 00:02:03.440
She sent me a pack, not a carton, a pack of Chinese cigarettes. Hm. Gold foil filter, whole pack's in Chinese. I'm like- Hm... looking them up on cigarette Reddit to figure out what's the vibe.

12
00:02:03.790 --> 00:02:05.820
And then in there she put in- Cigarette Reddit.

13
00:02:06.000 --> 00:02:17.420
[laughs] As a reference to Paula's, um, magazine article about pe- people who collect matchbooks, she put in an as- sort of assortment of matchbooks that she had collected from her favorite local places in Houston where she lives.

14
00:02:17.769 --> 00:02:22.200
Hm. Oh, that's awesome. Is that not the most thoughtful, cool gift that you've ever heard of in your life?

15
00:02:22.480 --> 00:02:31.820
So what I'm gonna tell, a- if you're listening now, listener, if this is, you know, for the cigarette smoker in your life, what I'm gonna tell you to do, take your iPhone, pause this, your, your...

16
00:02:31.860 --> 00:02:45.920
if you're listening to this on your iPhone, hold down the Siri button and say, "Siri, in 10 months," or whatever, "Siri, on December 1st, 2026, remind me to buy a pack of cigarettes and collect a lot of matchbooks," for the cigarette smoker in my life.

17
00:02:46.520 --> 00:02:58.320
Listener, you could steal this really, as Daisy said, innovative gift idea for your Christmas this year. Now is the time to get ahead. Yeah. Did I tell you what I did for people? By the way, did you get my card? I did.

18
00:02:58.420 --> 00:03:05.780
It was- Okay, good... really nice to receive. Thank you, Daisy. Um- It's been a pleasure potting with you too. Okay, g- um, I, I just keep it simple.

19
00:03:06.060 --> 00:03:12.320
Actually, no, it's really my handwriting's gotten so bad that, like, if I try to write a lot on the card I, I fuck it up and then I have to- Mm-hmm... throw the cards out.

20
00:03:12.360 --> 00:03:19.000
And then it's like, and then you're gonna go try to edit a little bit of it, but then you're smudging your ink- Yeah... and like the, the, the- And I'm like, haven't used white out since I was like 13 years old.

21
00:03:19.020 --> 00:03:29.020
White out. I forgot that existed. Um, I got everyone, uh, well, not everyone, I got some of my friends and Dirt contributors, um, these tiny little pewter wishbones. Hm.

22
00:03:29.049 --> 00:03:35.260
They're just like a little like tchotchke talisman- Oh, I love that... 'cause I was like, oh, you could put it in your purse or, like, put it somewhere with your little things.

23
00:03:35.300 --> 00:03:43.560
Like, I know a lot of people carry around like a rock or something, and, um, I just wrote, like, "I hope all your wishes come true in like 2026" or something. You know, I actually broke...

24
00:03:43.700 --> 00:03:53.380
I did a little wishbone break about a month or two ago. Really? I, I ha- somehow I had never roasted a chicken in my life. I've bought rotisserie chickens. I- That's surprising to me...

25
00:03:53.400 --> 00:04:01.630
I'll admit on record that I have a rotisserie chicken in the fridge r- as we speak. I will, I will use it for lunch later. But- Oh, fucking love a rotisserie chicken...

26
00:04:01.630 --> 00:04:12.760
yeah, I had never, I had never roasted a chicken myself, um, and I did. And actually I got it at the, uh, Asian grocer in my neighborhood. And so they, it's from a poultry

27
00:04:13.680 --> 00:04:21.140
farm, urban poultry farm down in Sunset Park- Mm-hmm... so it has the feet and like the whole he- head and neck- Mm-hmm... still on. Um, so, you know, that was part...

28
00:04:21.220 --> 00:04:27.360
I didn't, I did not- Was it pre-brined or seasoned or anything? No, no, no, no, no. Okay. I just, I just did a little like... I, I didn't even really brine it, I just salted it.

29
00:04:27.500 --> 00:04:39.310
But anyways, I, I did break the wishbone with my fiancé, and I, I did, I was on the receiving end of, of the wish. And did your wish come true? I don't remember what I wished for, but I, I- Fair enough...

30
00:04:39.330 --> 00:04:51.830
I think it did probably. [laughs] One can only hope. Uh, I woke up in the strangest way this morning to the low hum of helicopter blades over my neighborhood. No.

31
00:04:51.900 --> 00:05:03.670
And I'm kind of in like a third asleep status, you know, where I'm not really awake, but I can, I... just, like, I'm registering this noise. And then my fiancé, like, kind of shakes me, wakes me up,

32
00:05:04.580 --> 00:05:15.700
and she says, "There's this fire." I looked up on the, the neighborhood subreddit- Mm-hmm... to trying to find what's going on, 'cause she smelt, she smelled smoke as well.

33
00:05:15.740 --> 00:05:29.820
And so just a few blocks from my house, there was this five alarm apartment fire. I think four buildings burned, 30 families displaced. Mamdani was there earlier giving a, a press conference. It was, it was that big.

34
00:05:30.540 --> 00:05:38.950
But what's also... Oh, actually, w- really insane thing about this too is, so I think there was five firefighters injured, one civilian.

35
00:05:39.080 --> 00:05:47.980
But one of the firefighters in the third floor, it's like a, these were, these are two by three, two apartments on each floor, three story- Mm-hmm... classic New York building.

36
00:05:48.460 --> 00:05:53.200
But on one of the third floor apartments, there was an air conditioner in the window, and it fell on one of the firefighter's heads.

37
00:05:54.020 --> 00:06:01.039
But what's crazy about this too, like, I wouldn't necessarily just think about- That's why you're not supposed to have those, I guess... and this wa- and by the way, I still smell a little bit of smoke in my apartment.

38
00:06:01.469 --> 00:06:14.000
Yeah. But just three or four days ago, so the first Friday of the year, January 2nd that was, in my hometown, there was this big fire, and half of a block burnt down to like six businesses, a few apartments.

39
00:06:14.400 --> 00:06:29.150
I think there was no injuries-Two cats did die, but what was so tragic too, for me, is maybe my favorite business ever, favorite local business ever, surely, also burned down. Northtown Books- Mm...

40
00:06:29.180 --> 00:06:41.910
bookstore that's been there for 60 years. I've been going there my whole life. Uh, very few businesses, local businesses at least- Oh, good books... have had as big of an impact on my life and on who I am today.

41
00:06:42.640 --> 00:06:51.140
I remember so many times going there when I was in town waiting for my parents to pick me up or waiting for some friends, and you just go and you sit and you read a little while.

42
00:06:51.200 --> 00:06:58.620
I would go, like, every time I was back visiting and buy a book, and they'd do that thing where, you know, every $100 you spend, you get 10% off on your next book.

43
00:06:58.650 --> 00:07:06.880
And somehow it felt like every time I went they had that. And so we'll see. I hope that they come back. But all of this to say, PSA,

44
00:07:07.860 --> 00:07:18.180
if, you know, if you're a renter, make sure you have renter's insurance for this kind of thing. Yep. Make sure that you're not overloading your outlets with space heaters, this kind of thing.

45
00:07:18.660 --> 00:07:25.510
Very crazy for me personally to have this fire kind of right by where I live now and then also- That's really sad... in my hometown in just a few days.

46
00:07:25.880 --> 00:07:35.870
If you need an air filter for inside your apartment, I have one that we got, um, when Ben was living next to a smoker that's pretty good. I'd not thought of this but I can send it your way.

47
00:07:35.870 --> 00:07:45.180
When you say, like, when you said next to a smoker, do you mean, like, of, of, of cartons of cigarettes? Or do you mean like a barbecue? [laughs] Uh, [laughs] it... Important, um, important clarification.

48
00:07:45.540 --> 00:07:56.500
Somebody who smoked in their apartment. Oh, okay. Yeah. And it was just a lot. A wh- yeah, we do, we do luckily have an air purifier. Okay. And so it's, uh, it's off right now so I can podcast.

49
00:07:56.530 --> 00:08:06.620
So I am suffering a lower air quality right now for the sake of this podcast, but- Right... rest assured- Well, they always double as white noise machines... we'll be right back on. Anyways, [sighs] Dina's here.

50
00:08:06.760 --> 00:08:23.200
Let's talk to her. [upbeat music] What was the best thing that you got, uh, for Christmas, Dina? I went to go see Waiting for Godot with Keanu Reeves. Mm. Oh, that's incredible. Yeah.

51
00:08:23.500 --> 00:08:31.820
I went with my mom and my husband, and it was excellent. Did Godot ever show up? I... You know, I don't wanna spoil it- [laughs]... for anybody. It was- Okay, yeah, no... so- No spoilers...

52
00:08:31.880 --> 00:08:42.120
I, I, I was, as soon as you said that, I was waiting with bated breath to hear what you said because I, I have one other friend who'd been and, and they were disappointed. Really? Mm-hmm.

53
00:08:42.600 --> 00:08:55.360
Well, I just learned yesterday that there was a version that Steve Martin and Robin Williams did back in the '90s, which I'm curious about, but it sounds like it would be a little bit more hammy than this one, which was Keanu Reeves and Alex Winter from- Mm...

54
00:08:55.370 --> 00:09:04.699
Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure. That's a tough act to follow, and especially with, like, Robin Williams being gone kind of before his time. Yeah.

55
00:09:04.760 --> 00:09:14.680
I could see how, like, in retrospect, that theater run would probably take on this aura of, like... You know what I mean. Yeah. There was a bit of, like, Gen X nostalgia.

56
00:09:14.720 --> 00:09:25.760
They hammed it up in a few moments during the, like, back-to-back ding-a-ling. Yeah. The other famous- For all who attended for that reason... the other famous actors on Broadway

57
00:09:26.760 --> 00:09:38.160
event, play, that I've been getting a lot of ads for for the past few weeks is Dog Day Afternoon with Ebon Moss-Bachrach, Bachrach, I don't know how to pronounce his last name, and- Marnie's husband, that's how I think of him...

58
00:09:38.210 --> 00:09:44.540
there you go. Yeah. [laughs] But him and John Bernthal. Some people think of him as, like, the Bear cousin. I will always think of him as Marnie's husband. The Bear cousin. Yeah. I was tempted. Forgot about that.

59
00:09:44.580 --> 00:09:53.000
I've not bought tickets, but that's... I like that movie. Um, I'm not sure... You know, I don't know how you replace Al Pacino in that movie, but... Dog Day Afternoon.

60
00:09:53.040 --> 00:09:59.620
As a Windsor Terrace resident, that hits close to home. It was filmed on Prospect Park West. There you go. There you go.

61
00:10:00.200 --> 00:10:15.580
Dina, so we obviously are so excited to jump in and talk about what you're working on, but Francis and I had one point of business that we didn't quite get to in the intro, which is I'm not sure if you saw the news of Will Welch departing GQ to work for Pharrell.

62
00:10:15.660 --> 00:10:22.620
Um, but we were saying this is, like, if you'd... You needed to have, like, a first little media,

63
00:10:23.620 --> 00:10:31.220
trad media moment of the year, this is, like, a nice one to start on because it invites a lot of speculation of his replacement.

64
00:10:31.320 --> 00:10:42.160
Um, you know, we have a lot of conversation right now about, [laughs] uh, prediction markets, and it's always nice to see the, um [clicks tongue]

65
00:10:42.240 --> 00:10:47.840
the informal prediction market of media Twitter get fired up over something like this. Do you agree, Francis?

66
00:10:48.240 --> 00:10:59.090
The, so prediction markets, I am trying to find as we speak, I wish I'd, I'd thought of this earlier, if Polymarket or Kalshi have a who will be the next editor of GQ- Mm. Okay... up there yet.

67
00:10:59.360 --> 00:11:10.680
Because Daisy, you have speculated multiple times, I think, on mic on this podcast, there's one name in mind. So this is a great... If you're, if you're hearing this and, you know, you're looking this up and the odds are

68
00:11:11.620 --> 00:11:25.220
still really good, I think Daisy has a mind for it. Yeah, who's your bet? Well, look, I have to root for my boy Sam Hine. We go way back. Um, I started, when I started a blog in college, Sam was my successor.

69
00:11:25.670 --> 00:11:39.720
[clicks tongue] And so I feel like our destinies are inextricably linked in the media industry. Um, but I will say, I think the funniest possible outcome would be if Pharrell became the editor in chief of GQ. Yeah.

70
00:11:40.040 --> 00:11:56.110
Oh my God. I feel like working for someone like Pharrell, you're getting into the situation that many people are in with, like, the, the Taylors and the Charlies that... You know, the man probably sleeps in Tupperware.

71
00:11:56.200 --> 00:12:09.369
He, I, I imagine he will exist forever. [laughs] It's like taking a job for an immortal. You may- Totally... be working for a celebrity who will still have resonance for my grandchildren, for better or for worse.

72
00:12:09.380 --> 00:12:17.710
Right, it's like buying a tortoise that outlives you. Yes, exactly. It's, it's a great parent. Needless to say also, like, the tall hats. Mm-hmm. Like, is Welch gonna have to wear, like, a really- What is in that hat?

73
00:12:17.710 --> 00:12:28.088
... really big hat?First order of business, hats So I cannot find a next editor of GQ- Well, you gotta start it... entry. I could start it.

74
00:12:28.128 --> 00:12:34.768
What I could find- You could be a market maker, Francis I could be the market maker. You know, then, and, look, I wouldn't, I wouldn't be podcasting here if I was, you know?

75
00:12:34.828 --> 00:12:43.108
I'd be relaxing on, in my penthouse in Miami or something like that. Oh. Well, Dina, I saw something. I don't know if [laughs]

76
00:12:43.148 --> 00:12:57.378
I feel like this is not too sensitive for you, but I saw a passing reference to K-hole this morning on Twitter, and I g- I don't have the tweet queued up, but it w- it was a, a tweet about, um, being the first to assign the name to a trend- Right...

77
00:12:57.408 --> 00:13:08.518
and how this had become a sort of career hack for people. Um, somebody called it, like, career arbitrage, and then somebody was like, "Yeah, look at what happened to the people that coined normcore." But, like, famously

78
00:13:09.688 --> 00:13:22.808
from having talked to some of early K-hole people individually, it actually was not in any way the financial boom that people assumed that it was. Do you...

79
00:13:22.868 --> 00:13:30.058
I mean, I don't know how much you wanna talk about that, but I think it, it's interesting, like, as somebody... I've also, like, coined certain things.

80
00:13:30.088 --> 00:13:49.667
Nothing as big as normcore, but it is definitely one of those things where the assumption of brand security for getting to cr- creating something that goes viral in that way is way out of proportion to the reality of what you actually get, which is probably, like, an influx of new clients, and 99% of them are going to waste your time.

81
00:13:50.888 --> 00:13:59.758
Yeah. There was, like, a delightful rumor going around back in 2013 when it happened, which was that we were all millionaires, uh, which was hilarious- Oh, congrats...

82
00:13:59.828 --> 00:14:12.748
given the actual state of affairs, um, as- Well, I've been Mercury re- Retrograde, so I know that that's not true. Yeah. [laughs] Yeah. Woefully, um, no. My life in Berlin was a little bit more hand-to-mouth than that.

83
00:14:12.968 --> 00:14:18.428
But no, I mean, I think that I've got so many thoughts, I don't really know. It will not make you rich.

84
00:14:18.568 --> 00:14:31.608
And I feel like it ends up becoming, like, a managerial job of kind of claiming authorship, and that becomes almost, like, yeah, just a, an extracurricular that you end up having to do, which I've, I've never had any interest in doing.

85
00:14:31.828 --> 00:14:36.588
Um, so [laughs] fully, you know- Playing like hall monitor on the internet. Exactly.

86
00:14:36.688 --> 00:14:47.808
It's a very unsexy thing, and I think that it just sparks a lot of kind of infighting and, you know, claiming of ideas that, you know, are nebulous and move fluidly

87
00:14:48.768 --> 00:15:00.548
whether or not you were the first to acknowledge something in print. That's such a good point. Like, I feel like the, um, asserting your IP aspect of being a creative or artist, like,

88
00:15:01.908 --> 00:15:08.287
is such a time suck, and it's also, like, ramped up to kind of an impossible point.

89
00:15:08.388 --> 00:15:23.828
Like, I think there's a lot more people just throwing up their hands and saying, "Whatever," like, "AI appropriated my aesthetic," because they realize that, like, the alternative is to give what could be your creative energy towards fighting, um,

90
00:15:25.208 --> 00:15:36.988
fighting to assert your, like, authorship. Yeah. It's like, do you wanna be, like, the four-square mayor of an idea? [laughs] No. [lip smacks] I know. It's like people need to eat, but, um- What is the clout in that?

91
00:15:37.028 --> 00:15:47.308
Yeah. But I do think that, you know, as long as you were... I, I would much rather be, like, a more meaningful contributor to the discourse than somebody that coined the term first. Yeah.

92
00:15:47.388 --> 00:15:51.208
I honestly think it's probably a bit of a U-curve too where it's like

93
00:15:52.768 --> 00:16:01.138
when you're just starting out, there's probably some advantage in policing people from ripping off your ideas, and then the middle of the curve is, like, not worth it.

94
00:16:01.148 --> 00:16:09.948
And then when you're, like, really successful and rich and you can just send a cease and desist [laughs] that it kind of becomes worth it again. True. True. But I'm just... This is me. I'm just riffing.

95
00:16:10.068 --> 00:16:18.678
Um, we'll, we'll come up with a real theory and a, and a pithy name for it another day. I, uh, I was reading this book that I got through...

96
00:16:18.708 --> 00:16:25.828
Like, at work we do a sort of secret Santa, but it's just books, and I was gifted this- Secret book... secret book. [laughs] Well, precisely.

97
00:16:26.068 --> 00:16:35.968
But I was gifted this book that's about this feather thief, this guy who, like, made fly fishing lures, and he stole these- Oh, I remember this story... mm-hmm. He's...

98
00:16:36.128 --> 00:16:47.148
Yeah, he stole these birds from the British Natural History Museum. And so I started it last night, and the first chapter is about this guy, AR Wallace. I forget what the first two initials stand for.

99
00:16:47.208 --> 00:16:59.108
But he was, he's 13 younger, 13 years younger than Darwin, and he has this whole story where he, he was younger, and he went to the Amazon and collected thousands and thousands of samples of birds and insects and etc.

100
00:16:59.308 --> 00:17:03.328
And he's on the ship back to England. Ship catches fire. He loses all this.

101
00:17:03.388 --> 00:17:13.788
So he has to remake his name, and he goes to Malaysia, Southeast Asia in general, to amass a collection of bird, and es- especially, uh, birds of paradise.

102
00:17:13.848 --> 00:17:25.088
He was the first person to, to, to get samples of birds of paradise since, like, 300 years earlier, etc. But the reason I bring this up is there's this bit where he and Darwin

103
00:17:26.188 --> 00:17:32.568
discover this idea of the survival of the fittest at the same time, and he writes Darwin a letter because he's...

104
00:17:32.608 --> 00:17:42.608
The way the book frames it is he's seeing all these different varieties of bird of paradise and how did they evolve to have such an unoptimized, like, there's no predators, etc.

105
00:17:43.108 --> 00:17:52.608
And so he's coming up with this idea and he writes Darwin a letter talking about it, and then the book says... It, it does a lot of dramatizing, like, you know, inserting the feelings of these historical figures.

106
00:17:53.108 --> 00:18:01.848
But talking about how Darwin read it, and he's kind of sweaty. He's like, "I have been working on this idea, working on a, a book for, for years."

107
00:18:01.898 --> 00:18:13.588
And he goes to the council of British scientists or, or whatever, and in the end, he makes, takes claim to the idea, and this council of, of guys decides that he has claim to the idea.

108
00:18:14.058 --> 00:18:17.568
And this other guy, Wallace, never really [lip smacks]... He's fine with it.

109
00:18:17.648 --> 00:18:29.794
But it was just an interesting case of this-Like this group deciding who gets intellectual property when these two people were coming to the same idea at the same time, and then who knows who A.R. Wallace is, right?

110
00:18:29.964 --> 00:18:38.364
I can't even remember his, his first initials- Didn't he rob the British Museum though because he couldn't find some of the birds in the wild? Different guy. Different guy. The- there's like- No way... the, the... So

111
00:18:39.384 --> 00:18:47.804
this guy's- I didn't know that, um-... samples were robbed by the guy... feather autism was so widespread in the general population. [laughs] Yeah. Let me see. Edwin- Yeah... I think his name was, like, Edwin Rike.

112
00:18:48.344 --> 00:19:00.184
Okay Guy who robbed birds. I mean, I feel like, yeah- Edwin Rist... it's, like, synchronicity and collective consciousness, not to go down the woo-ness of it, but yeah, of course.

113
00:19:00.244 --> 00:19:06.414
People are kind of coming to the same conclusions based on, on the same inputs and signals and whatever's happening in the world at the same time.

114
00:19:06.414 --> 00:19:12.224
I feel like maybe feathers were sort of like the Chinese peptides of- Yeah... the findacicle. You know what I mean?

115
00:19:13.104 --> 00:19:26.404
Well, for, for this guy specifically, Edwin Rist, who he's, according to Wikipedia, he's now 37 to 38 years old. It was in 2009. He stole 299 rare or extinct bird specimens in order to craft artificial flies.

116
00:19:26.443 --> 00:19:38.444
So his obsession, his insanity was literally just around making fly fishing lures. Incredible. Well, speaking of fly fishing lures, [laughs]

117
00:19:38.484 --> 00:19:48.914
that's, that's a really good hook for our next segment, which is, um, talking to Tina [laughs] It's a good hook. That was good. I do... I was gonna get there. Um, you've been working at Cosmos since the summer. Yes.

118
00:19:48.914 --> 00:20:06.844
It's a discovery and curation platform that I actually use almost every day because, um, you guys built, like, an amazing resource for finding images in the public domain, which has been incredible, uh, for my work with Dirt, 'cause I like to use interesting imagery, but we can't always commission everything.

119
00:20:07.184 --> 00:20:20.364
Um, and I do actually care about IP. [laughs] Um, you're also a founding member of Arena. Obviously, there's some similarities there. We've had Zane from Silk on the pod. Mm-hmm.

120
00:20:20.464 --> 00:20:31.704
And I'm just curious, like, what's the culture of Cosmos? What is the thing in the category of platforms that are allowing people to

121
00:20:32.704 --> 00:20:47.224
tag, organize, mark, save, um, revisit images that is kind of the Cosmos secret sauce? Yeah. I mean, I think of all of...

122
00:20:47.764 --> 00:20:51.654
You know, obviously this is something that people have been doing since time immemorial- Mm...

123
00:20:51.684 --> 00:21:06.064
and especially it's like there's so many platforms that have come before, which we will honor, that have kind of, like, sparked this sense of curation, creation through curation in a way. And I feel like what

124
00:21:07.004 --> 00:21:21.804
very much, like, drew me into Cosmos, both with what they did with Public Works, which is what you're referring to, is it's the part of Cosmos that is all open access, kind of public domain imagery from the Met, from NYPL, different libraries like that.

125
00:21:22.784 --> 00:21:25.604
Um, yeah. But kind of what pulled me in more was, like,

126
00:21:27.444 --> 00:21:38.124
the wrapper of context around any individual image, which I have seen as, like, a widespread issue in visual culture, where people will take an image, they'll repost it on a different app.

127
00:21:38.164 --> 00:21:42.444
They will get attribution as the poster, but everything's kind of stripped from its context.

128
00:21:42.544 --> 00:21:50.924
You have to really care and do the deep diving to understand what photographer took an image, what publication it appeared in, what object is depicted in it.

129
00:21:51.064 --> 00:22:01.864
So what really kind of, like, got me through the door in a big way is that they're running captions using AI to identify what, uh, the provenance of any image is.

130
00:22:02.364 --> 00:22:12.004
And when you kind of, like, squint a little bit to see where that would be going, it would mean, okay, like, now all of a sudden all of the images on Cosmos, um, can be tagged in this way.

131
00:22:12.184 --> 00:22:24.434
If I'm a photographer and people have uploaded my content to Cosmos, there will be a world in which all of that can be kind of sluiced into an owned and verified artist profile, which for me just felt like...

132
00:22:24.464 --> 00:22:36.244
I think in my career I've been drawn towards these sort of, like, fundamental questions around technology. Like, before Cosmos, I was at The Browser Company working on reimagining a web browser. So

133
00:22:37.223 --> 00:22:48.544
just thinking about something that would, like, actually tackle this issue of decontextualization was, like, super exciting to me, and is what I'm working on right now. When I think about... Yeah.

134
00:22:48.644 --> 00:22:57.384
I feel like adding context to culture is a thread that really runs through your career, and as you were talking, I was remembering this awesome essay that you did that I think...

135
00:22:58.384 --> 00:23:04.924
I can't remember if it lived in a Google Doc, but it was about Billie Eilish. Can you talk about- Yep... that essay there?

136
00:23:05.024 --> 00:23:16.864
I feel like there's a lot of contextualization in that particular piece that I remember around pop culture at the time. Okay. So this is, like, a very 2020 story. But basically I watched the J.C.

137
00:23:17.764 --> 00:23:27.564
Chandor, uh, filmmaker behind The Situation Room, um, and other political documentaries, but he made this Billie Eilish documentary in 2020 called The World's a Little Blurry- Mm...

138
00:23:27.584 --> 00:23:48.124
now about, like, the making of this album and her tour around it, and I was just, like, hit by how, like, running on pure vibes it was in this way, where it was like the entire film was kind of, like, existing within the mental space of her bedroom, but kind of extrapolating that into, like, every other space she occupied.

139
00:23:48.204 --> 00:24:01.384
So where it was, like, zero context around any of the sites, except for, like, large text overlays that you were in New York or Paris or anything like that. And it really kind of got me thinking about, like, how... Yeah.

140
00:24:01.484 --> 00:24:03.744
Just kind of, like, communicating affect in that way.

141
00:24:04.304 --> 00:24:20.504
So I went on a bit of, like, a Twitter thread rampage about it, and then Trevor McFedries and Dennis Nazarov were like, "Hey," like, "You should build this out as an essay on mirror.xyz", which was a, you know, crypto publishing platform in that moment.

142
00:24:20.924 --> 00:24:33.054
RIP. So RIP. Yeah, like, not quite a Google Doc. But, um, I was also kind of interested in, like, what the first kind of, like, long form piece of cultural criticism that would live on chain could be. Mm.

143
00:24:33.484 --> 00:24:43.460
And was thinking about it in terms of, like-You know, I guess this is pre-Substack, or I don't know, like early moments of Substack. Substack existed, but it was not what it is today. Yeah.

144
00:24:43.480 --> 00:24:46.740
We're still like Patreon moment- Mm-hmm... there.

145
00:24:47.840 --> 00:25:05.080
Um, but just what it could look like to sort of like crowdsource and remunerate an editor, an illustrator, a researcher, myself, all of those things within the production of like a piece of cultural criticism as like an artifact.

146
00:25:05.440 --> 00:25:16.460
Um, so it ended up being like, I, yeah, I went very far down a rabbit hole, and it, it is actually gonna be included in a collection of essays that's being published in May. So- Yeah, let's talk about that.

147
00:25:16.540 --> 00:25:27.560
I was really excited- Yeah... when you told me about that because I think... Well, I mean, I don't wanna like say context a million times. Usually the buzzword on this podcast is taste, but like what...

148
00:25:27.600 --> 00:25:36.420
W- I've been thinking a lot about like why books, what do books add? What is the importance of publishing books when you're able to disseminate information so much more quickly?

149
00:25:36.830 --> 00:25:39.180
We're pub- we're starting our own publishing in print.

150
00:25:39.300 --> 00:25:54.020
Um, I feel like in the early internet, it was like internet could add context to books, and now I feel like it's kind of flipped and like the purpose of slow media is to add context to fast media. And

151
00:25:55.080 --> 00:26:09.320
a book, like an essay collection or a book that includes things that were originally written for the web is actually like a better source of truth about those things and what they meant and the time that they came in as those essays over time.

152
00:26:09.370 --> 00:26:19.940
Like that Mirror essay, that I know for a fact like this, that essay specifically will have been migrated to Paragraph, a different platform, in the last couple months. Um, and that's just like one platform.

153
00:26:20.370 --> 00:26:33.900
And so I think an issue with the internet is like, you know, speed, um, and the migration of things, dead links, dead internet, whatever, like it's very hard to encounter something...

154
00:26:33.940 --> 00:26:48.040
You're never encountering it in the time period it was born, and you're never encountering it in the, the true like, um, atmosphere and, and format in which it was born, or rarely. So, um, you know, a book is...

155
00:26:49.480 --> 00:27:07.060
I think that the, the speed of the internet right now and the amount of slop has actually reinforced the primacy of the book, and usually we talk about that reinforcement being on the level of taste, but it's also on this level of context as well, and I think we don't really talk about that enough.

156
00:27:08.060 --> 00:27:14.620
Yeah. I mean, I know that there's like taste, context. I'm gonna add craft there because I do...

157
00:27:14.680 --> 00:27:29.320
You know, I'm a visual artist as well, but I really think that like, uh, my approach towards language is similarly like very high craft, and publishing something within the context where that is possible, which is like a book form, is, I think, important.

158
00:27:29.380 --> 00:27:35.040
The, this is being published with a French publisher called After8 that does a series of artist writing.

159
00:27:35.200 --> 00:27:49.460
So they've published Nick Maus and Amy Sillman, and then now myself, um, and it's really kind of like working with artists that have a kind of like robust writing practice, um, which I think that it's like I...

160
00:27:50.560 --> 00:28:01.840
Yeah, I kind of come from a more traditional art world, but I still kind of like work in tandem and parallel in this more cultural, creative, technological sector as well.

161
00:28:02.960 --> 00:28:09.780
Um, but yeah, I'm kind of like interested in my writing kind of like reaching back into the place from which I came.

162
00:28:09.990 --> 00:28:37.140
There's also, I think with book form, like the embracing the fact that you can be wrong in some of your takes and like that being actually really an interesting thing that time can do, and when something is published, you can look back at the essays that you wrote and published and said, "Hey, you know, like I think this is like valuable in a moment," and this is like, uh, you know, kind of like has the artifact at the moment from which it was made and can be more or less true.

163
00:28:37.220 --> 00:28:48.440
But I think it's important for something to like be evaluated in, in hindsight in that way versus like anything only just being posted and then, you know, kind of getting like lost in the feed or becoming a dead link.

164
00:28:48.880 --> 00:28:49.640
Are you saying then that...

165
00:28:50.060 --> 00:29:04.450
'Cause you said like in a book you can be wrong, which implied to me that on the internet you can't be wrong in the same way, or rather that maybe when you post something o- on the internet you can easily just go and edit that post or quickly write a new post saying, "Wait, I was wrong.

166
00:29:04.520 --> 00:29:11.260
This is what I really meant to say. Here's the right thing." Is that what you're saying? Yeah. Yeah. There's like a b- uh, there's more self-editing.

167
00:29:11.340 --> 00:29:20.500
There's more kind of like I, I'll just call it like bravado of being like right in a specific moment and like not really revisiting it and seeing how something has aged.

168
00:29:20.580 --> 00:29:32.940
So that, I guess, is context in a way, is like allowing yourself to read something with the kind of like widened aperture of what else was happening in the world when that piece of writing happened.

169
00:29:33.620 --> 00:29:41.500
For the stuff that appeared on the internet first that is going to appear in the book, are you editing any of it? Or are you putting it exactly how it appeared originally?

170
00:29:42.420 --> 00:29:56.520
There are some kind of like light stylistic edits, but since most of them were published, not only on internet, but in like printed publications like Flash Art, Freeze. You know, E-Flux was online.

171
00:29:56.820 --> 00:30:01.360
Um, yeah, it's a mix of in-print and online published pieces.

172
00:30:01.420 --> 00:30:15.440
And then there's one longer form sort of like introductory essay that I wrote about Rotten.com, which is kind of like an origin story for myself and my relationship to the internet that's like framing the rest of, of the pieces in the book.

173
00:30:16.740 --> 00:30:29.540
You have, um... To go back to Cosmos, you, you write a newsletter for Cosmos called Sequence. Um, and it's sort of a way of contextualizing [laughs] what's going on on the platform.

174
00:30:29.650 --> 00:30:43.816
I've really been enjoying it, and it's a combination of like links and usually a short interview and highlighting an object and an aesthetic study of, um-Some certain trend or category that's bubbling up.

175
00:30:43.856 --> 00:30:51.876
Can you talk a little bit more about, like, the process of putting that together and how you think about it, um, i- within your work there? Yeah.

176
00:30:51.916 --> 00:30:59.616
This is kind of, like, the first thing that I tackled, 'cause I'm leading up marketing here, and just thinking about what...

177
00:30:59.656 --> 00:31:12.136
You know, people are, are using Cosmos for so many different reasons, from, like, redesigning an apartment to just kind of the, like, curation of sport activity, of, like, surrounding oneself with beautiful things and shaping a personal taste.

178
00:31:12.176 --> 00:31:22.316
So I think that there's, like, the activity that happens on the platform, but then there's, like, the meaning-making that needs to happen in terms of, like, understanding w- what any of this points to outside.

179
00:31:22.956 --> 00:31:30.636
And, um, I was really, you know, interested in doing something that feels timely. We do it weekly.

180
00:31:31.076 --> 00:31:45.476
It's a bit of, like, a culture roundup of looking at news stories across, like, fashion, design, architecture, art and whatnot. Um, and then kind of doing, like, um, smaller form of a trend piece,

181
00:31:46.436 --> 00:31:54.996
spotlighting people who are using Cosmos in different ways. Um, yeah, as you mentioned, and just kind of, like, link-sharing as well. But all of it is, like- Where do you find most of your links?

182
00:31:55.076 --> 00:32:00.116
Like, do you have a distinct information diet or is it, like, random?

183
00:32:01.036 --> 00:32:17.116
It's pretty wide-reaching, and I also have started, like, opening up a tip line on the Cosmos Slack for people to be sharing things because, you know, I'm turning these things around on a weekly basis with, um, the help of a writer, Casey Jane Allison, who's helping me with it as well.

184
00:32:18.376 --> 00:32:29.056
That makes sense. I wanted to ask about this, another essay you wrote, I think this was published in 2021, about irony. And I, I, I wanna read a little excerpt, but the...

185
00:32:29.176 --> 00:32:47.436
to really summarize, you were asked if irony is still a, a legitimate cultural response in art during the culture wars that continue to rage, and your short answer is, "No, it's not," because it's no longer a monoculture, and irony is more of a monocultural response.

186
00:32:47.536 --> 00:32:57.476
But when everything is so fragmented, it's much harder to tell, like, what's sincere and what's ironic, and so it's less effective. But where you get to it, and here I'll quote you, you say, "One of the many count...

187
00:32:57.516 --> 00:33:04.856
one of many counterpoints to irony, however, is the recent emergence of cringe and the content that has come to represent it across the cultural sphere.

188
00:33:04.896 --> 00:33:15.716
Cringe is the awkwardness that occurs when someone sincerely expresses themselves and is largely unaware of how their expression is received." And you, you come out in favor of cringe.

189
00:33:15.796 --> 00:33:23.186
The last line is, "To be cringe is to be human." You s- you wrote this four years ago. Has... Is this still your thinking or? Yeah.

190
00:33:23.236 --> 00:33:32.265
It's kind of what I was saying earlier about, you know, going on the record and then opening oneself up to, you know, the landscape of culture shifting.

191
00:33:32.456 --> 00:33:43.556
When I think about the definition as you, as I wrote it, that you just kind of recapped here, I think about, like, every piece of comms that I see coming from tech startup

192
00:33:44.736 --> 00:33:58.886
people on LinkedIn, and it's like, "That shit is cringe." And [laughs] but it is that definition. It's, like, extremely sincere thinking that oneself is, like, doing the work. Um, so do I find that to still be true?

193
00:33:58.996 --> 00:34:04.876
I think I saw on a lot of out lists that discourse around cringe is out, and I'd like to just hold space for that.

194
00:34:05.496 --> 00:34:10.676
[laughs] I will hold space for that, and I will also say the, the latest thing that we published on there is about cringe.

195
00:34:10.776 --> 00:34:20.496
Um, but the reason I published it is because I thought that the writer, uh, Lara Williams, had a really, really good distinct taste or take, and she

196
00:34:21.536 --> 00:34:36.896
knit a lot of stuff, recent stuff together from, like, Lily Allen to, like, the work of Tim Robinson. Her argument is basically, like, we have to separ a- separate out this idea of effective, uh, mediated cringe.

197
00:34:37.176 --> 00:34:42.776
Like, she talks about cringe as, like, something that's effective in the sense that, like, it's something we feel in, like, our nervous system.

198
00:34:42.836 --> 00:34:54.176
There's, like, this level of, um, evolutionary response to embarrassment and, like, wanting to fit in with the group that causes us to feel cringe on such, like, a visceral level.

199
00:34:54.896 --> 00:35:03.136
And she talks about mediated cringe versus embodied cringe, which is, like, mediated cringe is artists that are able to put cringe in service of their art.

200
00:35:03.196 --> 00:35:18.996
So, like, um, Nathan for You, The Chair Company, um, you know, stuff by Lily Allen, Audrey Hobart, um, as a sort of, like, clown in her music video, in her artistic presence. And it's...

201
00:35:19.036 --> 00:35:27.056
you make people uncomfortable in service of the art to cause them to question certain norms in society, whether they're fair.

202
00:35:27.076 --> 00:36:01.286
But because it's in the context of this art, there's usually, like, a resolution, where, like, the discomfort we feel in our nervous system as we experience this piece of art is, like, eventually resolved or counteracted by the substance of the questions intellectually that it causes us to ask, versus embodied cringe, which is the sort of, like, meme, "I'm cringe, therefore I'm free," which is, like, this sort of, like, antisocial behavior right now, where it's like, to ask people to adhere to norms is, like, in some way, like, fascistic,

203
00:36:02.256 --> 00:36:18.756
whether it's, like, talking too loudly in a cafe or just, like, um, you know, taking up just a ton of space i- online and, and just repeatedly hijacking other people's nervous systems, like, just because you can.

204
00:36:18.856 --> 00:36:28.656
Um, and you're making other people uncomfortable, not for artistic purposes, but simply out of your own sort of, like, selfishness. And I just really love this distinction.

205
00:36:28.696 --> 00:36:49.880
It really put into words something that I feel and would wanna say but f- would feel like I couldn't articulate it without feeling like I was making a argument for conservatismBut the way she threads the needle is actually, it's like, it's incredibly conservative to be,

206
00:36:50.940 --> 00:37:03.900
to be so individualistic that you think your behavior in any context should supersede other people's comfort without any sort of meaning or practice behind it.

207
00:37:04.480 --> 00:37:15.140
And so I was really happy to publish this, and I was like, "You know what? I actually think this does add something new to the cringe discourse," which I agree would otherwise be like completely played out. Yeah.

208
00:37:15.280 --> 00:37:21.420
I kind of can't wait to get into the shame discourse, which is like- Yeah... I think also the undercurrent that nobody's talking about it.

209
00:37:21.460 --> 00:37:52.900
Like, there is this like w- a German word of like Fremdschäme or just like disembodied shame that one gets from, which is like also just feels very German, of like watching someone else stumble and fumble and like not being able to sort of like distinguish what their kind of like embodied experience of that is, and you're just like hurting by watching them, which I learned about while watching Curb Your Enthusiasm with my like college German boyfriend to kind of illustrate what that, that moment might be.

210
00:37:52.960 --> 00:38:04.180
And I think at the, at the undergirding of like a lot of the discourse around cringe is ultimately like negotiating shame in the public arena, and like how, how one owns that or does not.

211
00:38:04.580 --> 00:38:17.140
So that's not, you know, really like... I, I think that that's just like, I would prefer to call it what it is. I think cringe is l- just like a, a wrapper around, like, how we negotiate shame.

212
00:38:17.150 --> 00:38:29.900
[laughs] I, I'm reminded of something a former boss of mine told me. This is like a lesson in working in any sort of content media, right? Building content. We were working at a, doing marketing for a tech startup.

213
00:38:29.980 --> 00:38:40.840
But he said, "Francis, don't kill the part of yourself that's cringe. You have to kill the part of yourself that cringes," which is to say, "Don't be ashamed. Don't be-" Did Ari say that to you? I think he did.

214
00:38:41.160 --> 00:38:47.720
Uh, a friend of the pod, former guest of the pod. Oh. Shout out to Ari, who maybe should be a little bit more ashamed sometimes. I... Well, maybe. But- [laughs]... you know, it works from, I...

215
00:38:47.760 --> 00:38:53.760
And I don't know, may- maybe he pa- maybe I'm paraphrasing that and maybe he was parroting it, but I, I attribute it to him in my mind.

216
00:38:54.180 --> 00:39:06.980
But I see people say versions of this all the time, whether it's like in a newsletter, I think I read this in a newsletter, a version of it, just a few days ago that was like 26 things to do in 2026 if you work in social media, right?

217
00:39:07.100 --> 00:39:10.929
I see versions of it on LinkedIn, but the idea is just- Substack core... be earnest- [laughs]...

218
00:39:11.100 --> 00:39:23.060
when you're, like, if, if you want to be producing content on any of these platforms or as an independent creator, you have to, you have to get over that shame of, of being earnest and of trying this thing.

219
00:39:23.740 --> 00:39:31.910
The problem with shame is like all the wrong people are ashamed, right? Like, I s- [laughs] I think- I'm adequately, I'm adequately ashamed- Yeah. Well, I-... I would say [laughs]...

220
00:39:31.910 --> 00:39:37.180
I simultaneously feel like too many people are held back by shame that's impacting their lives.

221
00:39:37.400 --> 00:39:47.680
I see it with writers whose work that I, um, would like to see more of in the world, that shame is a component of like what's holding them back. We know it's not writer's block 'cause that's fake.

222
00:39:48.280 --> 00:39:54.600
Um, and then on the other hand, I'm like, every time I see a tweet that's like, or a post that's like, "Bring back shame," I'm like, "Absolutely."

223
00:39:54.900 --> 00:40:00.530
So it's like we're simultaneously, like we're in like the K-shaped economy of shame where it's like- [laughs]...

224
00:40:00.600 --> 00:40:12.350
all these, there's a certain degree where like people, all the wrong people have this sort of surplus, and then we have the shamelessness of the current political environment. Um, and it's really hard to square it.

225
00:40:12.460 --> 00:40:27.760
I think that's what makes it so hard to talk about because when you, if you wanna write an essay being like, "Actually, like, stop being cringe," all the wrong people will assume that it's about them and internalize it when it's like, it's never gonna reach the people who are actually taking up that space.

226
00:40:28.220 --> 00:40:32.050
Um, but it's still articulating something important- Well, is, is-... about this point...

227
00:40:32.050 --> 00:40:41.380
part of the solution then shaming, the act of not feeling shame yourself, but of actively trying to make other people feel ashamed, maybe more shaming? Francis, you're welcome to try. You're welcome to try.

228
00:40:41.420 --> 00:40:45.080
It occurs to me that this is the anniversary of [laughs] January 6th.

229
00:40:45.140 --> 00:40:54.020
I was thinking about the, um, the load-bearing Azealia Banks Instagram story about, uh, of people scaling the Capitol that I think was captioned method behavior.

230
00:40:54.660 --> 00:41:01.080
Um, I think that, I mean, it's the paradox that, like, the shameless are unshameable, right?

231
00:41:01.260 --> 00:41:17.000
Like, I think maybe there's a, there's a, a tier beneath the shameless of, of enablers and useful idiots that can sometimes be brought back to reality, and I think those are the people that you can really only...

232
00:41:17.040 --> 00:41:26.220
That's the, that's the best that you can hope to reach. Like, picking off people, I mean, somebody like Marjorie Taylor Greene, right? There's a certain selfishness to her pivot, right?

233
00:41:26.320 --> 00:41:32.540
But, like, you can eventually pick off people like that by appealing to their values if they have values.

234
00:41:33.100 --> 00:41:42.820
Um, but I think some, some people are just, like, unreachable, and unfortunately all of those people are enabled by our technological and political culture right now. I'm also- Yeah...

235
00:41:42.840 --> 00:41:53.100
I'm reminded of an ad- Sadly, Pete Hegseth, unshameable. Exactly. True. I'm reminded of an ad I've seen on Instagram a few times over the last couple weeks. I think it's for Kalshi, and I'm gonna- [laughs]...

236
00:41:53.120 --> 00:42:04.360
slightly mess up the, uh, the exact verbiage, but it's something to the tune of, "Trade the results of football games." And then what I do know it s- it says is, "Legal in all 50 states."

237
00:42:04.510 --> 00:42:14.860
And that's so shameless because it's so saying, "Bet on football games. It's legal to bet on football games using our app in all 50 s- in all 50 states," but it's not betting.

238
00:42:14.920 --> 00:42:25.280
It's trading on results, and that is just so shameless. Mm. Yeah. It is. Language is really, it's a beautiful thing to witness.

239
00:42:25.380 --> 00:42:37.620
Um, when you were t- Francis, when you were describing that, that article about, you know, 26 things about social media and I said Substack core, um, I, it occurred to me that I'm curious whether there...

240
00:42:38.020 --> 00:42:46.528
Cosmos is obviously like a newer platform, but you have-Um, I don't know if you can reveal the number of users. I think you had told me privately. Like, you have a massive user base.

241
00:42:47.048 --> 00:42:56.128
Um, and I'm curious if there's been the emergence of something like a Cosmos core. Um, 'cause from my perspective, like, a platform has really made it when you end up in one of those, like,

242
00:42:57.068 --> 00:43:07.348
uh, trend matrixes, like the arena hat, right? Like, when, when the certain user of a platform becomes identifiable as a meme, that's when you've, like, made it.

243
00:43:07.468 --> 00:43:12.248
So I'm curious if, like, there's a Cosmos starter pack or a Cosmos core, like what would be on there?

244
00:43:13.308 --> 00:43:19.918
Well, I do think that there has been the emergence of the Cosmos girl in the way that there was like the Tumblr and VSCO girl. Oh, yeah.

245
00:43:20.388 --> 00:43:33.668
We're, we're seeing this, uh, making the rounds, and I think that what that aesthetic can be pinned down to is just, you know, it's slightly messy girl aesthetic.

246
00:43:33.728 --> 00:43:42.528
It's a little bit more, like, robust and uncurated and, and playful. And, like, not to get into the gender politics of any of it, but it's like people...

247
00:43:42.568 --> 00:43:51.628
Yeah, people are really kind of like identifying and latching onto that in a way. Um, we have like a...

248
00:43:51.688 --> 00:44:08.988
Today there's like a fairly dominant aesthetic that exists on the platform, and there's some, like, decisions being made in terms of taste, in terms of like how and why and where we surface things above like a certain aesthetic threshold that's been determined, which is really, I think, interesting.

249
00:44:09.228 --> 00:44:09.448
Um,

250
00:44:10.488 --> 00:44:26.028
but I think we are doing a big launch in the next few months, which will sort of like open that aperture and maybe like redefine instead of like what is within a Cosmos aesthetic, more like what is without, um, or like what is like outside of, uh, outside of that threshold.

251
00:44:27.028 --> 00:44:36.578
Can I say as, as a slight aside, the... You used robust there, and robust is one of those words that I've trained myself not to use in working in tech marketing- Oh...

252
00:44:36.628 --> 00:44:47.708
because I've seen so many- Should we call Bella Hadid? Well, no, but- [laughs]... like every damn product says like, "A robust suite of features," or whatever feature- Interesting... so robust.

253
00:44:47.998 --> 00:44:53.588
[laughs] And so it's just one of those ones that, like, I've checked off on my list, but the way you used it, it was like- Need to strike it from the record... it was...

254
00:44:53.628 --> 00:45:04.197
No, but the way you used it felt like not like that at all. It was the first time I've heard or seen [laughs] that word used in like three years. So I'm like, that's actually... Wait, that is robust. A correct use of it.

255
00:45:04.288 --> 00:45:16.658
Yeah. You know what? Hey, like if I'm not B2B SaaS pilled, then... [laughs] I was thinking about, um, photos of Sofia Coppola's bedroom as you were talking. Exactly. Exactly. There we go. That's the Cosmos girl.

256
00:45:16.688 --> 00:45:29.688
A robust photo of Sofia Coppola's bedroom. Yeah. [laughs] Um, I love it. I, I hope to meet the Cosmos girl and maybe even become her. Are there any other- You may already be.

257
00:45:29.808 --> 00:45:48.468
As you, like, when I, when I've ever come into like an audience development or marketing role in a platform, the first thing I do is sort of audit what's going on under the hood, um, in terms of user behavior and, and things that, like analytics that we don't necessarily look at on a day-to-day basis because we're too in the weeds.

258
00:45:49.188 --> 00:46:07.848
Um, I'm curious like what sort of user behaviors have surprised you in a good way or, or in a bad way as you sort of like came in, started auditing what was happening and, and thinking about how people could be influenced into using the platform in, in ways that really prioritize the use cases you're interested in?

259
00:46:09.108 --> 00:46:22.168
Yeah. I mean, the first thing that comes to mind is that I am almost 40. I work in the creative pro-... I consider myself, in some sense, like I'm a creative professional. I show up to my laptop to get shit done.

260
00:46:22.248 --> 00:46:33.268
I have a job to do. I'm very task-oriented. And being surrounded by the artists, writers, and, like, numerous versions of creative directors in my life, I kind of assume that everyone else is using

261
00:46:34.848 --> 00:46:40.928
tools online for the same reason. People are there to work and get shit done. So when I...

262
00:46:40.968 --> 00:46:53.948
You know, not having spent that much time, like, in the community or on the platform when I first showed up, I assumed that this was a tool being used by interior designers and graphic designers and art directors and event planners and all of that.

263
00:46:54.448 --> 00:47:13.688
And then we did a lot of user research kind of like over the summer and early fall, and it was really surprising to see that people who are younger and students and, you know, people who have absolutely nothing to do in the creative fields were just spending their time, like, culling and organizing images for their own personal inspiration for...

264
00:47:13.698 --> 00:47:23.628
without any intended outcome. And if you look at something like Pinterest, like, so much of their marketing and so much of the product is outcomes oriented. It's like, "Here's the cupcake. Make the cupcake."

265
00:47:24.228 --> 00:47:36.008
And on Cosmos, it's truly something that feels more like meandering and wandering and, you know, like a sort of creative act in its own right, which was really surprising.

266
00:47:36.508 --> 00:47:47.208
What do you think about the prediction that Pinterest is gonna be acquired by OpenAI? No comment. [laughs] No comment. Okay. Fair enough. No comment. Though I do really love... I mean, like I feel like that

267
00:47:48.428 --> 00:47:59.968
was just a rumor from a journalist who was disappointed- It was literally a prediction that got like the unusual Wales treatment and became, like, fact. [laughs] Exactly. That is Kalshi core. So Kalshi core. For sure.

268
00:48:00.008 --> 00:48:07.718
Has there been... Da- uh, Daisy, has there been more writing about it? I haven't really kept much eye on this. Uh, I know. I threw it up on Clone- I'm curious what the take is...

269
00:48:07.718 --> 00:48:18.328
'cause I thought it was an interesting prediction, but I thought it was funny that, like, tech Twitter was reporting it as like if it was news. Um, yeah. I mean, that one in, in particular, but also I...

270
00:48:18.368 --> 00:48:26.468
Like, I had like a... I don't know. This is a personal aside, whatever. Like I... I was like, "Kalshi, what's up? What's going on here?"

271
00:48:26.508 --> 00:48:37.458
And like the first thought that I had was I was like, "Oh, this is the logic of StockX and Airbnb and Uber and the sharing economy, just like extrapolated to opinions." Mm.

272
00:48:37.468 --> 00:48:52.226
And that seemed like a really interesting lineage in a way, where it was like-All of a sudden, all of us, like, renteas, we, we all kind of, like, saw the objects in our lives that we weren't even owning, but just renting as, like, assets for value extraction- Mm-hmm...

273
00:48:52.256 --> 00:49:04.156
with, like, you know, fractional ownership and whatnot, and just taking that into, like, the dematerialized realm of opinions was like, "Oh, that's what this is about. I see why this [chuckles] exists now."

274
00:49:04.636 --> 00:49:11.876
How does Cosmos think about AI and both, like, the curation of stuff that's been generated by AI and the use of AI in curation?

275
00:49:13.676 --> 00:49:27.336
Uh, I think that one of the aspects of it that people really love, and I do too, is that you can just easily filter or hide out images that are, you know, using AI to detect whether or not they're AI-generated or not.

276
00:49:27.376 --> 00:49:40.576
So, like, anything that, that the Cosmos, you know, back end assumes is AI, it'll, it'll block or hide, which I think people have a real appetite for, and I know that, like, you know, other larger platforms like Pinterest is kind of a hellscape of.

277
00:49:40.696 --> 00:50:02.416
Um, but then the other ways in which it's using it, I kind of say it's, like, AI for good, um, because you're specifically using AI to, like, identify provenance and context around images, which, like, unless you're doing, like, a global wiki hack, uh, to, like, manually attribute all of those things just isn't gonna happen at the scale that it needs to.

278
00:50:02.716 --> 00:50:17.506
So that's- For some reason I thought that you were gonna say AI for girls. [chuckles] AI for Cosmos Girls. [laughs] Yeah. There's an essay. It's interesting. Yeah. I did this article, um, it must have been

279
00:50:18.836 --> 00:50:33.826
more than 10 years ago now, about a trend that was happening in, um, art museums and people who worked in archiving around tagging, tagging their collections, having...

280
00:50:33.896 --> 00:50:38.746
finding ways to get visitors to actually contribute to these tagging projects.

281
00:50:39.356 --> 00:50:57.536
And so I think there's a lot of what we talk about as AI, which is, like, basically tagging rebranded, um, where there's always been these repositories of tagged images and information and the ability to pull from them with specific queries.

282
00:50:57.596 --> 00:51:08.276
It's just it's all been collapsed into the stuff that is new, um, which is, like, the refinement of, you know, the ability of these agents to complete those tasks.

283
00:51:08.936 --> 00:51:17.886
Um, but I think user tagging and the ability to query those tags, um, has always existed and been, like, a really useful part of these platforms. Yeah.

284
00:51:17.976 --> 00:51:30.655
Um, but there is something about the authenticity of context beginning with the user and being interpreted by the computer versus beginning with the computer and being interpreted by the user that feels really important.

285
00:51:32.196 --> 00:51:38.556
Yeah. I mean, I think that there's, like, layers of context on something like Cosmos. Like, there's the tagging that happens on the image.

286
00:51:38.756 --> 00:51:48.536
You know, right now that's, like, automatically done, and if you feel like it's in- inaccurate, you can kind of report that, and there's a system for, for doing that. But then the way, you know, the, um,

287
00:51:49.436 --> 00:51:59.525
the clusters as we call them, like, the way that you manually curate and organize images based on taste or some other notion, that's kind of like the, that's the human layer.

288
00:52:00.176 --> 00:52:06.356
But I do think that it's like those are, those are kind of like- Mm-hmm... it's a question of scale. It's like what problem are you trying to fix?

289
00:52:06.416 --> 00:52:32.876
Are you trying to have this be an activity that an individual who's very spec- like, of a very specific psychographic that enjoys manually tagging and, like, refining data, uh, versus are you, you know, someone who actually has absolutely no idea about niche lamp designers from the 1930s and is there to learn, and, like, what does a tag do at scale for an audience like that?

290
00:52:33.116 --> 00:52:40.536
Totally. I mean, I... To go back to that article I was working on, like, a big takeaway from these projects was, like, it's actually really hard to get people to do this.

291
00:52:41.116 --> 00:52:51.476
Um, people want to be able to go back and search on a museum website and be like, "What was that painting with the dolphin?" And they wanna be able to do it off of, like, a single detail that they remember.

292
00:52:51.656 --> 00:53:01.196
Um, but, like, to use myself an example, I, I was telling Francis before you came on, I still use Tumblr, and every time you post on Tumblr it's like, "Do you wanna add some tags to this?" And I'm always like, "Fuck no."

293
00:53:01.556 --> 00:53:06.746
Like [laughs] Yeah. I don't, I don't have time. So it's... I think

294
00:53:07.836 --> 00:53:20.086
people who are archivers on the internet, like, we're all curators, but there's a specific type of person, like, probably the type of person that's on the cigarette subreddit or, like, the feather guy.

295
00:53:20.116 --> 00:53:26.996
Like, the 2025 version of that is the person whose, like, special interest is really, like, annotating and tagging the internet. No genius.

296
00:53:27.516 --> 00:53:34.716
And- Yeah, I- Um, we have to, like, really value it and, and, like, enable those people, I think. They're very, uh...

297
00:53:34.736 --> 00:53:41.276
Maybe they're cringe sometimes, but they are extremely important load-bearing part of the internet as we've understood it up until this point.

298
00:53:42.236 --> 00:53:53.056
The one that I personally really enjoyed partaking in was, like, the, the New York Public Library has had many versions of these, you know, crowdsourced tagging projects in the past.

299
00:53:53.496 --> 00:54:08.106
There was one where it was running through their entire menus collection, which is absolutely amazing, and you just had to manually tag the listings on the different historical menus that I think were all donated by, like, an Astor or something like that.

300
00:54:08.106 --> 00:54:18.316
That's so sick. I had no idea about that. That one, I, I did that one because I was like, "Well, you know, it's meditative in a way." Totally. But that's not, that, that's not what I need.

301
00:54:18.356 --> 00:54:21.896
That's not the role that I need Cosmos to play in my life, you know? Mm-hmm. This...

302
00:54:22.076 --> 00:54:42.306
So hearing the two of you speak about this, I'm thinking about, like, tags as Dewey Decimal System in that the Dewey Decimal System is something that's so rigorous and so, like, specific and refined, and not that I fully understand the Dewey Decimal System, but tagging on the internet as, like, too many tags when maybe it's helpful, but you're, "Oh, like, what's that one painting with the dolphin?"

303
00:54:42.336 --> 00:54:50.235
And I remember one detail and because there's so many tags on it and so much context, but it's, like, low-quality context, then you can easily find it.

304
00:54:50.596 --> 00:55:09.076
But maybe you were saying if, if, if this person doesn't know about, like, 1930s lamps, if this person doesn't know about 1930s lamps designers, should they be tagging images of this 1930s lamp, or are they providing low-quality tags that actually water down the knowledge and the context?

305
00:55:09.696 --> 00:55:09.996
But

306
00:55:10.896 --> 00:55:36.696
I then also thought of two weeks ago, as we record, about two weeks ago, Instagram introduced a new rule where you can only put up to five hashtags on a post or reel, which is, I don't know the full logic behind them, but it sounds like them trying to fight maybe abuse of too many hashtags and trying to put a thing, a, a piece of content in a context where it doesn't necessarily belong and forcing people to be more rigorous about the context.

307
00:55:36.736 --> 00:55:38.996
But that's... I guess what...

308
00:55:39.116 --> 00:56:02.456
the, the point I'm trying to pull out here is there's such a thing as too many tags, and things should have less tags that are more considered, but the problem is the people creating these tags often aren't necessarily considering them and either it's sort of an abuse, as with Instagram, or it's just a lack of knowledge that then waters down the product, and- Yeah...

309
00:56:02.466 --> 00:56:12.316
ultimately streams of knowledge. I just don't think that the technology needs hashtags today in the way that it did previously given- I think that's also true... the rise of AI. I think it's just, it's...

310
00:56:12.356 --> 00:56:24.036
Yeah, it's like a vestigial tail at this point. Guys, hashtags are out for 2026. You heard it here first. [laughs] This has been Tasteland. Thank you so much, Dina. This was fun. This was delightful. Thank you, guys.

311
00:56:24.816 --> 00:56:38.896
[outro music]