WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.280 --> 00:00:14.670
For years, the crypto industry claimed there was a coordinated extra-legal effort to cut crypto off from the banking system. The media called it a conspiracy. We now call it Operation Chokepoint 2.0.

2
00:00:15.020 --> 00:00:27.780
A new report from the House Committee on Financial Services confirms many of those things we in crypto already knew. There was, in fact, a conspiracy to debank us. We're gonna explain it.

3
00:00:32.460 --> 00:00:37.800
[upbeat music] The first time we heard this phrase, Operation Chokepoint 2.0, was what?

4
00:00:37.880 --> 00:00:51.400
Like, twenty twenty-three, I think, when Nick Carter published some, uh, exposés on this, and a lot of it was, like, conversations he'd been having with some of their LP-- with some of their clients and investment companies.

5
00:00:51.440 --> 00:00:58.140
And the thing is, like, when he published this, everyone in our industry was like, "Oh yeah, this makes sense. This has been happening. There has been debanking."

6
00:00:58.440 --> 00:01:09.300
We couldn't really point to why, but basically every few months, like, new drips come out and confirm this, and this is kind of, I would say, like, the capstone report, Colin.

7
00:01:09.320 --> 00:01:25.550
Is, like, this is a formal report, again, kind of from, like, a GOP-driven committee, but this is an actual real report with, like, the formal documentation of what is, what is a, what I would call a conspiracy.

8
00:01:25.880 --> 00:01:30.810
It's Operation Chokepoint 2.0, so I ask you, Colin, what was 1.0?

9
00:01:31.080 --> 00:01:41.280
Operation Chokepoint 1.0 was an Obama-era mandate where the Obama administration's agencies sought to systematically sever certain industries and businesses from the banking system.

10
00:01:41.820 --> 00:01:54.980
The ones that were targeted were coin dealers, ammunitions and guns brokers and dealers, I believe the marijuana industry, and some of the adult entertainment industry. People in those industries were also targeted.

11
00:01:55.250 --> 00:02:06.440
And it seems like Chokepoint 2.0 is kind of the revival of this towards a completely different industry, or rather two industries, the crypto industry and some of its tech-adjacent part-partners, right?

12
00:02:06.460 --> 00:02:17.440
You know, Marc Andreessen was on Joe Rogan Experience before the election talking about the debanking and how it really spread into crypto and into a bunch of different tech-adjacent fields.

13
00:02:17.540 --> 00:02:20.520
And just a few words on how this story was broken.

14
00:02:21.420 --> 00:02:40.100
I think, number one, no one outside of Bitcoin or crypto is going to take an industry proponent and an industry professional like Nick Carter seriously when he writes about this, which I think is, you know, maybe from a first-principle perspective, okay, it makes sense why people think that.

15
00:02:40.560 --> 00:02:51.360
But if you actually think deeper about the problem here, you need to ask yourselves why Nick Carter was in the position to break the story in the first place, and I think the reason for this is, my gut, is he's friends with a lot of the people who were affected.

16
00:02:51.800 --> 00:03:03.980
They were going to talk to him about this off the record or, or feel like their confidentiality was going to be actually at, you know, um, adhered to, and, and Nick was actually going to respect that when releasing the story.

17
00:03:04.250 --> 00:03:06.000
They're not gonna go to a finance journalist for this.

18
00:03:06.060 --> 00:03:15.680
Number one, it doesn't really fit a lot of narratives against crypto, and they would say, "Well, if the government's saying there's fraud, then that's the whole story. There's-- Then you shouldn't be banked," right?

19
00:03:16.320 --> 00:03:26.980
Um, whereas with someone like Nick, who's actually knows these people, knows how the plumbing works, has interacted, maybe even had some problems himself, right? He was kind of well-positioned to break this.

20
00:03:27.440 --> 00:03:34.640
And I think when you look at how it was broken and now what's coming out, um, now, I mean, Pirate Wires is an alt media.

21
00:03:35.120 --> 00:03:40.080
Um, it d-definitely trad media, and people who read trad media would not look at it as a single source of truth.

22
00:03:40.160 --> 00:03:47.140
But chalk one up again for the conspiracy theorists because this was a hundred percent happening, and now we have the receipts for it.

23
00:03:47.180 --> 00:04:08.420
And I think that's probably the most interesting part of this, Charlie, is we can look at, like, date by date, the memos and the actions that were taken by the SEC, the FDIC, um, the OCC, and all of these different agencies to try to basically completely choke out banking, uh, relationships for the crypto industry.

24
00:04:09.180 --> 00:04:09.380
Yeah.

25
00:04:09.420 --> 00:04:18.399
And I will actually, uh, I tweeted about this right before we recorded it, and I got a little bit of chatter, and I'll actually highlight a couple tweets 'cause I think it'll help us get in front of a couple points early.

26
00:04:18.519 --> 00:04:30.640
So [clears throat] um, there's a, a guy named Akeem Warr. He's a very good critic in Bitcoin. Uh, give or take some things he says, but he's a good critic. And he says, "I mean, what is this, though?

27
00:04:30.700 --> 00:04:42.180
Like, imagine if Dems take over the House this year and write a report saying that Trump uses power to drive woke ideology out of universities. Is that profound?" I'm like, so, uh, I wouldn't be surprised to hear that.

28
00:04:42.300 --> 00:04:48.730
Um, we would be in-- It would be a disagreement over, like, ideologically should he or shouldn't he, but I wouldn't be surprised, like, to hear that.

29
00:04:48.730 --> 00:04:59.040
I'd be like, ah, Trump's kind of like, he's a strong man and he, uh, he, like, very much plays his sides. The thing is, I don't think many people would say that he wouldn't do that.

30
00:04:59.100 --> 00:05:09.090
I-- With the, with the OCP 2.0, it's like we felt like literal conspiracy theorists were even saying it's happening. And then [clears throat] um, another one, which is,

31
00:05:10.240 --> 00:05:24.320
I said, "So conspir-- So this would be a conspiracy in the sense that there were people having off-the-record conversations and coordinating efforts to harm the industry, not just relying on, like, policy or enacting policy that we disagree with."

32
00:05:24.340 --> 00:05:36.640
And I would say yes. So this is both, like, a coordinated shadow effort to debank, um, despite the industry actually being compliant or at least attempting to be compliant.

33
00:05:36.710 --> 00:05:51.660
'Cause it was really, really murky exactly, uh, how they designed this to provide an, an unending maze towards compliance without actually creating regulations or any kind of MO.

34
00:05:51.680 --> 00:06:11.640
And I say, like, it would be better if, um, I would consider it more fair at least, or intellectually honest, if there were, say, uh, an agreement at the federal level to say, "We want-- We do not want the crypto industry here, so therefore we're going to make it impossible to be here," as opposed to not saying it and quietly debanking people and making them feel crazy.

35
00:06:11.700 --> 00:06:22.028
So-I- We have a timeline. Yeah, and- And, yeah. Sorry, I just, I wanna highlight that last point. Like, the main takeaway when you read this document is that

36
00:06:23.008 --> 00:06:40.688
ultimately there was this regulatory carousel that you could never get off with the Biden administration, where the Biden administration and its agencies were basically saying crypto is a huge risk, but did nothing to provide c-clear regulations or steps that financial institutions could take to mitigate those risks.

37
00:06:41.278 --> 00:06:47.228
So it's kinda like saying, "Hey, this business that you're engaged in is a risk to your, to your clients and your shareholders."

38
00:06:47.328 --> 00:06:56.308
Okay, what do we need to do outside of what we're already doing, which you said we need to be doing, and we've agreed to that? What else do we need to do? Uh, no comment, right?

39
00:06:56.668 --> 00:07:03.128
I mean, there were multiple times where the FDIC and other agencies said, "You need to tell us before you deal with crypto clients. You need to get approval."

40
00:07:03.468 --> 00:07:07.888
Banks would, would, would apply for that approval, and they would hear nothing back.

41
00:07:08.428 --> 00:07:22.788
So with regards to the timeline, I think the where to start, because this is the domino that really pushed, um, th-that pushed the crypto industry into a corner and led to several bank failures, and that was starting with the office of the contro- or excuse me,

42
00:07:23.708 --> 00:07:36.188
starting with the FDIC, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, sending, uh, these letters to, uh, crypto companies. Um, or, uh, sorry, Damian, we're all over the place. Cut that. I'm trying to get my, uh...

43
00:07:36.868 --> 00:07:45.568
Here we go. Um, the action seems to have started with the FDIC sending these pause letters to 24 or so financial institutions.

44
00:07:46.038 --> 00:08:01.728
And what these pause letters said, this campaign took place between 2022 and 2023, is it ordered banks to delay or stop crypto-related services, uh, wait for the FDIC review for those services and those accounts before processing funds in those accounts.

45
00:08:02.298 --> 00:08:07.228
It required dozens of written responses back and forth about this whole rigmarole.

46
00:08:07.308 --> 00:08:16.708
Um, they were, banks were required to unearth a l- like mountains of legal documents and financial documents, and it also included in-person supervisory visits.

47
00:08:17.168 --> 00:08:26.208
The reason why I'm starting here, um, and the document might as, might well draw a clear thread reading this. I didn't see any direct quotes.

48
00:08:26.228 --> 00:08:40.668
But if you remember, as we've covered this on the Writers Room in the past, there were three bank failures that were more or less forced failures because of these banking restrictions with Operation Choke Point 2.0 in March of 2022.

49
00:08:41.208 --> 00:08:53.908
Those bank failures were Silvergate, uh, Signature- Yes... and Silicon Valley Bank. So just for the quick timeline, on March 8th, 2023, Si- S- uh, Silvergate announces voluntary liquidation of its assets.

50
00:08:54.388 --> 00:09:03.708
March 10th, 2023, Silicon Valley Bank collapses and its funds are seized. March 12th, 2023, um, Signature Bank is shut down by regulators.

51
00:09:04.148 --> 00:09:12.928
These banking failures were basically a domino effect, ca- a cascading effect, because a lot of these banks had, um, accounts with th- these banks had accounts with each other, and they dealt in the same industry.

52
00:09:12.968 --> 00:09:14.988
They mostly had crypto clients.

53
00:09:15.088 --> 00:09:27.128
Um, I, I know companies that, a lot of crypto companies banked with Silicon Valley Bank, and, um, you know, m-many people at our industry were scrambling to figure out how to fill payroll in this time.

54
00:09:27.148 --> 00:09:38.368
And there's this one quote here that I just wanna highlight from Fred Thiel, um, from his- Fred Thiel, the CEO of Marathon Digital, the largest miner, depending on the time, based on hash rate.

55
00:09:38.398 --> 00:10:02.048
And so h- this is from Fred Thiel's testimony during the House committee meetings, uh, where a lot of this was brought to light and that this report, uh, bases a lot of its, uh, testimony on, says, quote here from Fred Thiel, "We banked with Signature, and when the FDIC shut down, uh, shut them down and Flagstar took over the accounts, none of the crypto accounts were allowed to be a part of those assets acquired, and we were forced to immediately seek accounts with other banks.

56
00:10:02.328 --> 00:10:13.228
We were able to open an account with another bank, deposited $70 million after going through the approval process, and six days later we were told we had to shut down the account because our bank no longer will bank, because the bank will no longer bank crypto companies.

57
00:10:13.268 --> 00:10:22.748
We were basically given a policy decision by the bank that they would no longer service crypto companies, period, and we were asked to withdraw our money in what I was think 24, 72 hours." So imagine that, right?

58
00:10:22.878 --> 00:10:34.468
Like, you move $70 million to this new bank because your old bank was shut down because of this measure, Operation Choke Point 2.0, and then the new bank says, "Because of the same thing that led to that bank's failure, we cannot service you."

59
00:10:35.108 --> 00:10:43.628
And I wanna just reiterate, the reason they couldn't service them was because ultimately regulators were giving them no choice. They were giving them no clear indication.

60
00:10:43.668 --> 00:10:51.068
They were saying, "You can't deal with these funds until you get our approval and until these are regulatory sound," and there were no guidelines set up for that.

61
00:10:51.128 --> 00:11:06.407
So I think those, those pause notes, um, as far as I can, or those pause letters were kinda like the first shot across the bow, and then over the next two years, there's just a slew of letters and memos from these agencies that exacerbate the problem.

62
00:11:06.448 --> 00:11:15.448
It's funny, 'cause Fred's story, I have a story exactly like that, except it wasn't $70 million. [laughs] It was a few million dollars less. But it's like, it was weird.

63
00:11:15.488 --> 00:11:21.068
I was like, I got literally debanked for, for no reason. Like, why? It was out of nowhere. Went to a new bank.

64
00:11:22.548 --> 00:11:31.248
Scrambled to get the money in that bank, and then after going through the approval process, they're like, "Oh, you can't be here either." Uh, the same thing. It was, it was wild.

65
00:11:31.888 --> 00:11:38.588
And, uh, it was, like, um, very difficult to explain to friends and family that this was, uh, very strange to me.

66
00:11:38.888 --> 00:11:50.228
And I had been, I, you know, I've had other companies with other normal bank accounts, uh, and so it was very difficult to explain to people that I wasn't scamming anything, that they're, they were like, "Why, why can't you just get a bank account?"

67
00:11:50.248 --> 00:11:52.848
I'm like, "I, I don't know why. I have no why. I can't figure out why."

68
00:11:53.308 --> 00:12:02.228
And so a lot of people in our industry were having the, in our industry were having these exact same experiences, and Fred's story is just one of many.

69
00:12:02.288 --> 00:12:06.548
It just happens to be recorded in a testimonial format on the House floor.

70
00:12:06.768 --> 00:12:25.332
Yeah, and what's crazy about this is this has been a problem since crypto businesses have been of any consequence and have actually, you know, once they started scaling, uh, you know, 10 years ago and actually getting decent revenues, building their businesses, hiring out peopleA lot of them still to this day bank in stable coins because of these problems.

71
00:12:25.352 --> 00:12:49.512
And what's interesting about this to me, and we'll get into the history here in a second, is in his first administration, the, the, the Trump presidency and his agencies actually did a little bit of work to try to increase regulatory clarity and let banks deal in digital asset customers without these threats of having, you know, [chuckles] um, funds frozen or being told that they can't deal with these cu-customers.

72
00:12:49.622 --> 00:12:51.652
And the Biden administration rolled those back.

73
00:12:51.692 --> 00:12:59.382
So there was, like, this small window in twenty sixteen to twenty twenty where, like, the banking relationships in crypto were actually s- like, it seemed like they were on the up and up.

74
00:12:59.382 --> 00:13:08.452
People were a little bit, uh, you know... They, they were a little more relaxed about their ability to actually be banked, and obviously all that went out the window.

75
00:13:08.532 --> 00:13:19.812
Uh, but going back to the timeline, uh, going back to a date in twenty twenty-two, on August 16th, the Federal Reserve gets involved and releases the supervisory letter SR226.

76
00:13:20.412 --> 00:13:36.712
This letter warned that digital asset activities pose risks to, quote, "safety and soundness, consumer protection, and financial stability," all the buzzwords that the boomers love to hear, um, if you wanna scare them away from an asset that's making all of their children have any sort of shot at the life that they did.

77
00:13:36.992 --> 00:13:45.171
Anyway, this required banks to ensure digital asset activities were legally permissible. Now, this goes back to the kinda catch twenty-two that banks were dealing with.

78
00:13:45.712 --> 00:13:49.312
What is legally permiss- uh, permission, uh, legally permissible?

79
00:13:49.752 --> 00:13:59.432
Because there are anti-money laundering laws on the banks that these banks-- on the books that these banks are already following, you know, blacklisted addresses, I'm sure, going through a scan.

80
00:13:59.492 --> 00:14:11.592
Like, there, there are anti-money laundering and compliance tools in place, and they're following those, but they're being told they need to do more without being directly told what that is.

81
00:14:12.312 --> 00:14:21.152
Um, they're told from this letter they need to analyze both state and federal law. I would be very shocked if they weren't [chuckles] doing that already. These are banks.

82
00:14:21.512 --> 00:14:30.632
They're not fly-by-night payday loan lenders, right? Like... And the last thing is they have to notify the Fed before engaging in digital asset activities.

83
00:14:30.731 --> 00:14:48.042
This is the one that just absolutely sends me, because I don't know in, in terms of, like, you know, broad-reaching banking regulations, but in what world does a bank need to notify the Fed when they're banking any other client for any other reason?

84
00:14:48.532 --> 00:14:58.752
Yeah. Right? Unless... I, I, you know, I can't really think of a situation, because if there's something to do with fraud or tax evasion, that's for the IRS anyway, or at least for tax evasion.

85
00:14:58.842 --> 00:15:01.422
Um, so I think that was another one of the big ones.

86
00:15:01.472 --> 00:15:10.752
Once you have the Federal Reserve stepping in like this, it, you know, kind of the emperor's has no clothes, and now his skin is peeled off, 'cause it kinda shows exactly where their head's at.

87
00:15:10.792 --> 00:15:18.652
They just want this entire industry gone because it threatens the model that the US dollar system runs on. Um... [clears throat] Yeah.

88
00:15:18.752 --> 00:15:26.732
So, uh, a-as you kinda go through the timeline, I will then reinforce by saying, uh, by using this format.

89
00:15:26.792 --> 00:15:40.292
Here's a conspiracy that we had, and then here's where the conspiracy according to the report, which is verified in real, like, uh, hard, like, letters, uh, is verified. So conspiracy theory, the shadow ban was real.

90
00:15:40.672 --> 00:15:45.552
The banks were privately told by regulators to drop crypto clients even if the clients are fully compliant.

91
00:15:46.952 --> 00:15:57.542
Verified, we verified that the FDIC sent pause letters to effectively, uh, stop or delay digital asset activities. And, um,

92
00:15:58.632 --> 00:16:07.932
more specifically, the report says the r- uh, that regulators used informal guidance and threats of enforcement rather than actual rulemaking.

93
00:16:08.032 --> 00:16:16.722
So this traps the banks in, like, a regulatory purgatory with their crypto clients, specifically from the executive summary on the page, page one.

94
00:16:16.752 --> 00:16:28.892
Regulators use this discretion to exert substantial pressure on financial institutions, often through informal guidance such as inter-agency statements or interpretive letters to discourage these entities from engaging in digital asset-related activities.

95
00:16:29.592 --> 00:16:36.312
In addition to informal guidance, regulators weaponized enforcement actions to achieve an anti-digital asset agenda.

96
00:16:36.412 --> 00:16:49.432
So rather than this being actual, like, actually defined anywhere in any kind of regulatory guidance, [clears throat] it is, uh, implemented with informal guidance and threats to the bank.

97
00:16:49.532 --> 00:17:04.012
So that's the conspiracy that we suspected, but we had not, uh... Now it is validated in, uh, the report. So- I, I think that's, again, just going back to all the wonderful color and commentary there, Charlie.

98
00:17:04.232 --> 00:17:13.032
You know, it's a really important point to make. You expect to have laws on the books that clearly spell these things out or clear regulations.

99
00:17:13.752 --> 00:17:33.752
And the way in which this was prosecuted, it was prosecuted through these letters sent to the financial institutions and kind of under-the-table tactics that really speak to, I think, what, uh, uh, a lot of the problems like libertarian and conservative types have with the expansion of the federal bureaucracy since the New Deal, right?

100
00:17:34.272 --> 00:17:44.012
But going back to the timeline, so echoing what the Federal Reserve did, or rather the, the Federal Reserve echoing what the FDIC does here, because this happened before the Federal Reserve's letter.

101
00:17:44.492 --> 00:17:49.512
But in April twenty twenty-two, Federal Reserve's letter that we just touched on came out in August twenty twenty-two.

102
00:17:50.172 --> 00:17:57.412
In April twenty twenty-two, the FDIC sent out a financial institution letter, uh, that basically said the same thing as the Fed letter.

103
00:17:57.512 --> 00:18:16.882
It said, "You are required to get FDIC sup-- uh, you are re-- it requires all FDIC-supervised banks to notify the FDIC before engaging in crypto custody, payments, and related services for Bitcoin companies and crypto companies," using all of the justifications of fraud, et cetera, that they've used for scare tactics in the past for this.

104
00:18:17.492 --> 00:18:22.212
Now, what's interesting about this too is that that precludes crypto custody, right?

105
00:18:22.312 --> 00:18:47.060
Well, the Trump administration actually, um, or rather a Trump-eraTrump-era appointees in twenty-twenty-one, um, in, in the OCC or the Office of the Comptroller of, of, uh, in the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, uh, basically may- issued a mandate saying crypto custody is allowed, stablecoin reserve deposits are allowed, blockchain and stablecoin payments are allowed within the traditional financial system.

106
00:18:47.100 --> 00:18:50.840
So this is a complete rollback of prior guidance from a prior administration.

107
00:18:51.620 --> 00:19:08.560
Uh, and, and I-- that you'll see that throughout these documents that the Biden administration was rolling back things that had been done prior, not uncommon in presidencies, but, you know, obviously for the crypto industry, a huge shock after coming from a, a reg- generally favorable regulatory and, and, uh- Yeah.

108
00:19:08.590 --> 00:19:23.400
And I'll say that, uh, there's a difference between, I might be showing my naivete here, but there's a difference between rolling back guidance, uh, which is fine, I just disagree with it, and, like, doing it in a way where our industry does not know that that has happened.

109
00:19:23.480 --> 00:19:25.100
Right. So. Right.

110
00:19:25.160 --> 00:19:51.620
And when the Biden r- uh, administration reversed this in twenty-twenty two, they issued a, a clarification on that letter, um, on IL-one-one-seven-nine, which was previously, uh, issued in the Trump administration, which banks must receive non-objection before engaging in cryptocurrency activities, barred any crypto activity prior to supervisory approval, and shifted the legality standard to subjective examiner satis-satisfaction rather than a more objective metric.

111
00:19:52.220 --> 00:20:01.520
Um, multiple national trust bank charters stalled as a result, and this effectively reintroduced permission-based banking for a specific industry, and I think that's really the important point here.

112
00:20:01.580 --> 00:20:10.940
It's, like, kind of showing the exact use case of Bitcoin by saying the traditional financial system is walling you off and asking for permission. Obviously, Bitcoin does not.

113
00:20:11.580 --> 00:20:22.320
Uh, a few more timeline things in the Biden administration. On March ninth, twenty-twenty two, you know, right in the middle of these cascading bank failures, right? I mean, if, if, if y'all recall the, uh...

114
00:20:22.360 --> 00:20:29.570
We just talked about how Silvergate, I believe, was the first to fail on March eighth. I mean, yep, March eighth, Silvergate announces voluntary liquidation.

115
00:20:30.060 --> 00:20:44.340
So on March ninth, uh, the Biden administration, in all of their infinite reactionary wisdom, says, an executive order-- issues an executive order warning of financial stability risk regarding crypto, illicit finance risk, and directed agencies to expand enforcement instead of rulemaking.

116
00:20:45.000 --> 00:20:54.900
So this is kind of the gloves-off moment, and when things start really accelerating. You know, those three banks that we mentioned were used as the sacrificial lambs to say, "See?

117
00:20:54.940 --> 00:21:06.140
This is super dangerous, and we need to get this under control." And then from there on out, you have a number of the letters and actions that we just went through over the next twenty-two, uh, over the next two years.

118
00:21:06.680 --> 00:21:20.840
Uh, the document also spends quite a lot of time talking about the SEC [chuckles] and all of the things that it did or didn't do, rather, to, uh, to foster innovation and regulation within cr- the cryptocurrency space.

119
00:21:21.420 --> 00:21:33.670
We won't get over the-- we'll go over those, but it's the TLDR is, like, under Gary Gensler, there was this policy of basically, um, creating policy by enforcement instead of enforcing policy.

120
00:21:34.440 --> 00:21:47.460
And it led to a number of, you know, stalemates within the crypto ecosystem for a number of, you know, uh, DeFi applications, uh, and certain tokenized, uh, use cases.

121
00:21:47.660 --> 00:21:56.020
Whether or not you agree those exist, if you're doing things by the book, there's no reason why you shouldn't be able to list those in the US. The-- Yeah. We-we're going to enforce things.

122
00:21:56.060 --> 00:22:01.040
We're gonna do things by the book, and then the book, but the book does not exist, so we cannot reference it.

123
00:22:01.520 --> 00:22:16.460
Um, this is one where I think even some of those hardcore Bitcoiners do line shields up with entities like Hayden Adams over Uniswap, or even some of our mortal enemies, Brad Garlinghouse over at Ripple.

124
00:22:16.470 --> 00:22:37.240
Like, Ripple fought this tooth and nail and won in the federal courts, and at some level, as much as I just cannot stand Ripple, um, I was cheering because this was a victory for our industry, um, [clears throat] even if it was Ripple enjoying the spoils of that the most.

125
00:22:37.720 --> 00:22:46.920
I'll go back to my, uh, format of, uh, conspiracy theory and then validation. So conspiracy theory. Reputational risk was veri- was weaponized.

126
00:22:47.000 --> 00:22:54.980
Regulators used vague terms like re-reputational risk to force banks to drop legal but politically disfavored entities.

127
00:22:55.600 --> 00:23:05.680
This is verified in the report on page seven, uh, as the report confirms that regulators used reputational risk assessments to pressure banks.

128
00:23:05.740 --> 00:23:15.820
If a bank did n- did not drop a crypto client, they faced threats of lower CAMELS ratings, which are safety and soundness scores, which could cripple their ability to do business.

129
00:23:15.860 --> 00:23:23.660
That's one of several ways that this soft shadow reputational risk is weaponized. And then also it was coordinated.

130
00:23:23.720 --> 00:23:35.600
So it's the Fed, the FDIC, and OCC who are working together, so it wasn't this kind of individual department thing. It was multiple departments across the federal, uh, across the bureaucratic apparatus.

131
00:23:36.180 --> 00:23:43.720
[clears throat] Um, there's talk of, like, policy sprints that the Biden ad- administration used to align internal strategies.

132
00:23:44.290 --> 00:23:56.080
And then when Congress began to, uh, draft their actual legislation, like the stablecoin bill we saw finally get through recently, these agencies ramped up their ability to choke the industry before the laws could be passed.

133
00:23:56.140 --> 00:24:09.260
On page twenty-seven, in fact, this goes in, um, into detail, where in one email, a Department of Treasury employee wrote to staffers of the FDIC, Federal Reserve, CFPB, and the SEC, and the CFTC, in advance of a meeting the following day, "I want to flag..."

134
00:24:09.420 --> 00:24:22.560
I quote, "I want to flag that in light of the fact that we've all recently received texts from the House Financial Services Committee staff developments in Congress that the committee's interest will be likely a bigger part of the discussion than previously anticipated."

135
00:24:22.620 --> 00:24:37.296
So these are emails and not, like, papered up, you know, regulations that people are gonna follow. So that's my-Addition to we had these conspiracies and now we're like, okay, the docs are coming out, the emails.

136
00:24:37.376 --> 00:24:50.216
Oh man, it's always somebody's emails being released, isn't it? [laughs] Just because, uh, you know, Ch- Choke Point 2.0 is over doesn't necessarily mean that banks are your friends, guys.

137
00:24:50.896 --> 00:25:01.556
So this is Jack Mallers, a tweet from him recently, I'm gonna get it up on the screen for those following along on video, where he says, and I quote, "Yes, a proud moment. So proud I got it framed."

138
00:25:01.576 --> 00:25:18.796
And this is a letter from, uh, JPMorgan Chase, Chase Bank, informing Jack Mallers that they are closing his account, uh, for the same reasons that banks were restricted from using Bitcoin during Choke Point 2.0, for vague reasons of fraud, all that kind of stuff.

139
00:25:19.256 --> 00:25:32.136
So the reason why I pull this up is, like, I'm-- I wanna be very optimistic about Choke Point 2.0 being over, and this being made of a big show, this kind of like what was a witch hunt or is perceived as a witch hunt actually having real smoke there and real fire.

140
00:25:33.196 --> 00:25:41.936
Uh, I wanna just contextualize that with the fact that at the end of the day, the government is one enemy, and, like, quite frankly, the banks and the entrenched financial system are the other enemy.

141
00:25:42.246 --> 00:25:52.516
And just because the government is not forcing banks to close these accounts now doesn't mean the banks won't do it, 'cause they can do whatever they want. They don't have to bank you if they don't want to. Yeah.

142
00:25:52.896 --> 00:26:05.456
Uh, I'll echo that. You know, it's, it's very much not over. It's just the, the, the, the, the heat, the initial heat and the initial, uh, salvo is probably over.

143
00:26:06.016 --> 00:26:15.676
Uh, now it's a little more complicated 'cause we have to figure out what is still happening, to what degree, who's behind it, and we're not conspiracy theorists anymore.

144
00:26:16.126 --> 00:26:21.216
Uh, the battle's being fought a little bit more out in the open it seems, which at least we've won that battle.

145
00:26:21.336 --> 00:26:37.336
So I'm certain that our industry, which I think reactionarily or, uh, very reactively, uh, s- supported Trump and raised some of the biggest money ever towards a campaign for that single, uh, single issue PAC that we had, the, the crypto PAC.

146
00:26:37.936 --> 00:26:46.516
Um, I think our industry will probably have, have some reckoning ahead of us, um, for the mast that we tied ourselves to under this current administration.

147
00:26:46.576 --> 00:26:56.536
So, um, for the time being, we'll at least celebrate that we're not getting debanked as quickly and as rapidly, and it's a little more clear how to conduct business in the United States.

148
00:26:56.956 --> 00:27:08.476
And it appears that the existential risk that we feared, which was the end of the crypto industry in the United States, is not the near term future. So we will see where we go.

149
00:27:08.556 --> 00:27:21.856
If you like this kind of podcast, if you like more conspiracy theories, make sure to s- like and subscribe to Blockspace Podcast, where Colin and I hit, uh, conspiracies and, uh, and, and more.

150
00:27:21.936 --> 00:27:35.836
So make sure to leave us a, uh, review if you like it. And if you hate it, also drop that review and we'll try to get better. So thank you so much. Catch you all next week. [outro music]