WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.100 --> 00:00:12.300
[upbeat music] What's up, y'all? Welcome back to Blockspace Live, brought to you by CleanSpark. Iran wants your Bitcoin.

2
00:00:12.340 --> 00:00:22.360
Well, they don't want your Bitcoin, but they do want the Bitcoin of shipping companies that are trying to navigate the Strait of Hormuz during the two-week ceasefire that was announced last night.

3
00:00:23.030 --> 00:00:29.000
That will be our lead story today. One of the stranger ones I think I've come across since we started doing Blockspace Live.

4
00:00:29.080 --> 00:00:39.960
And then we will follow it up with one of the biggest news items so far this year, certainly this quarter in Q2, Morgan Stanley becoming the first US bank to offer a Bitcoin ETF.

5
00:00:40.470 --> 00:00:51.100
And we also have some banger interviews lined up today. We've got Antoine Ponce of Chaincode Labs on first to talk about the things that he's been working on in anticipation of our OpNext conference.

6
00:00:51.420 --> 00:01:04.820
We also have Jay Patel, the CEO of Lygos Finance, to give us a rundown of the cracks that we are seeing in the private credit market and why insurers might be in hot water with their exposure to private credit, but maybe not as much as some doomsayers might say.

7
00:01:04.840 --> 00:01:13.100
And then to close out the show, we will be touching on Bitdeer's new ASIC, the A4, and The New York Times figured out who Satoshi was.

8
00:01:13.480 --> 00:01:23.980
Psych, they probably didn't, but we will be unpacking a story that dropped today from The New York Times, a one-year-long investigated exposé on who the identity of Satoshi is.

9
00:01:24.440 --> 00:01:28.080
Probably won't shock you because you've heard this name thrown around- [chuckles]... for Satoshi before.

10
00:01:29.440 --> 00:01:42.320
Blockspace goes live Monday, Wednesday, Friday at noon Eastern, featuring quick hits in the latest in Bitcoin, mining. We talk about AI now, emerging tech. Make sure to like and subscribe.

11
00:01:42.480 --> 00:01:53.750
Get that notification button so you know when we go live. If you like this, it turns into a podcast shortly after we wrap up. You can find that anywhere podcasts are found, Spotify, Apple, RSS.

12
00:01:54.300 --> 00:02:08.030
And if you like this, you will love our newsletter, newsletter.blockspacemedia.com, coming at you on Fridays. Good long-form deep dives from Colin and I. Lastly, we have a conference. It's just over a week out.

13
00:02:08.160 --> 00:02:20.400
You can still book that flight. There are a few tickets left. We are sold out on VIPs. This is a technical conference and investor conference in New York City, OpNext, O-P-N-E-X-T.D-E-V.

14
00:02:20.500 --> 00:02:35.320
There's only a handful of tickets available. I'll see you in New York next Thursday. This show is brought to you by CleanSpark, ticker, NASDAQ-listed CLSK. More on them later on the show. Let's kick it off.

15
00:02:35.440 --> 00:02:44.680
Colin, I'm excited to talk about Iran with you because we've noticeably skirted the Iran issue because, like everybody else and their dog is covering this.

16
00:02:45.620 --> 00:02:56.400
But finally, finally, it has something to do with Bitcoin, so we can finally unshackle ourselves and talk about Iran and Bitcoin. But before that, we have something a little more timely.

17
00:02:56.480 --> 00:03:06.640
That's a joke, which you'll get in a second, because I've got in the wings, I've got Antoine from Chaincode Labs, and we're going to talk about this very interesting thing going on on Bitcoin Signet.

18
00:03:06.680 --> 00:03:21.080
I'll have him explain. I'll bring him on here. Antoine, welcome to Blockspace Live. Hey, guys. Thanks for having me. Yeah. So, um, you are leading a very interesting demo, and this is

19
00:03:22.140 --> 00:03:32.820
pretty technical and a little bit deep to start off this stream with, but we're going to dive into it. Antoine, what is happening on Bitcoin Signet right now?

20
00:03:33.540 --> 00:03:51.480
So we're doing a demo of blocks on a test network that take a long time to validate. These are blocks that are not the worst case, very far from the worst case, actually, uh, but would be valid on the main network.

21
00:03:53.320 --> 00:04:07.860
So let's get into this a little bit more. What does it mean to validate a block? And then why is it bad if it takes a long time to validate a block? Yeah, sure. So, um,

22
00:04:08.840 --> 00:04:22.260
in Bitcoin, you, uh, check the state of the system for yourself. You check that you, uh, indeed own, uh, your own Bitcoins and that people transferring, uh, Bitcoins make valid transactions.

23
00:04:22.360 --> 00:04:29.860
You don't rely on a third party. So in order to do this, you need to do some computation. And, um,

24
00:04:31.000 --> 00:04:46.860
the amount of computation that you need to do necessarily bounds, uh, the accessibility to this, uh, sovereignty that, uh, is provided by full validation of the system to not have to rely on a third party.

25
00:04:46.960 --> 00:04:52.640
So accessibility to full validation is one issue with blocks that take a long time to validate.

26
00:04:53.080 --> 00:05:06.100
But another one is probably more important, is that it creates perverse incentives for miners to try and delay their competition. Because in mining, as you know, uh,

27
00:05:07.320 --> 00:05:17.620
something like a handful of seconds of, uh, a head start can be a very big advantage for one miner and drive off their competition.

28
00:05:18.260 --> 00:05:25.220
So there, there is today on Bitcoin ways to make trans-- uh, to make blocks that take a very long time to validate.

29
00:05:25.540 --> 00:05:39.120
The worst case would be like over ten minutes, over half an hour on a regular server, and over a dozen hours on something like a Raspberry Pi that people use nowadays.

30
00:05:39.660 --> 00:05:52.040
But there is also the ability-- Because the, the very worst case is not-- I don't want to, to say that it's an existential threat. It still costs some money to, to the attacking miner to create this very worst case.

31
00:05:52.420 --> 00:05:56.260
But there is also al- uh, va- via [clicks tongue]

32
00:05:56.460 --> 00:06:20.688
different blocks that you can create that cost a lot less to the miners, but still delay their competition for like five seconds or ten seconds.So this is a range of like what we would consider to be edge case scenarios, but they do allow perverse incentives and various forms of unfair advantage or just really undesirable toxic, um, things to happen on Bitcoin.

33
00:06:21.328 --> 00:06:32.308
Um, so and you guys are testing this. I guess like why do we need to test this? Um, you know- [laughs]... Bitcoin's been around for 16 years. It, it feel like-

34
00:06:33.328 --> 00:06:47.728
it feels like, you know, uh, there's a lot of people working on it, like why is this test significant? Well, it's really, it's not really a test. Uh, this issue has been, uh, demonstrated in private environments before.

35
00:06:47.808 --> 00:07:03.048
Uh, we didn't release all the details, and today we're doing a, a demonstration rather so that Bitcoin users can experience for themselves on their own nodes, on their own hardware, how long it takes to validate such blocks.

36
00:07:03.068 --> 00:07:09.028
And it's, again, only a minimal version of what an attacker could do, so they can see it for themselves.

37
00:07:09.287 --> 00:07:23.568
And the reason that we want them to see it for themselves is that the fix for this vulnerability is a consensus change. It's a soft fork. And we need Bitcoin users to activate soft forks eventually down the road.

38
00:07:23.728 --> 00:07:36.488
There is no activation proposal right now, but we want to build consensus so that Bitcoin users will eventually upgrade to a soft fork. And this gets into what you're working on.

39
00:07:36.568 --> 00:07:42.548
Colin, did you wanna- Well, I, I just wanted to ask a, a question to clarify, two- a kind of a two-part question.

40
00:07:42.628 --> 00:07:53.268
So I understand correctly the poison block attack, a miner, uh, sends, ah, basically broadcasts this block that takes a long time to verify. The other miners can't verify it in time before the next block is mined.

41
00:07:53.308 --> 00:08:03.678
That gives that miner an unfair advantage to mine the next block in the chain. Is that, is that roughly h- how this goes down? I'm just trying to, um, contextualize it for listeners who might be less technical.

42
00:08:04.868 --> 00:08:15.148
Well, there's two issues with the, the way the, the current Bitcoin network works, uh, the validation time is going to also affect route propagation time.

43
00:08:15.848 --> 00:08:25.028
Block propagation time is going to increase the stale rates for all miners, but it's going to increase it more for small miners than for big miners.

44
00:08:25.418 --> 00:08:35.668
So there is this unfairness, uh, giving an advantage to big miners with, uh, which is going to push mining centralization. But there is also... it's not necessary. Like, we can upgrade.

45
00:08:35.788 --> 00:08:40.468
We could in theory upgrade the network such as we can propagate blocks faster.

46
00:08:41.288 --> 00:08:54.397
But the, the validation thing is that a miner needs to validate a block before they start wor- uh, working on the block building on top of it. Today, they sometimes skip the validation for a very small amount of time.

47
00:08:54.408 --> 00:09:03.138
But if they skip it for longer, it can create systemic issues for the network. And so they, they, they are blocked by, by this, uh,

48
00:09:05.148 --> 00:09:17.478
uh, by this validation time, and the attack would be for one miner to delay all its other competition to be mining on a stale tip for five seconds or 10 seconds. So that, that's essentially what, what you said. Yeah.

49
00:09:17.478 --> 00:09:27.838
Yeah, yeah. Right. So that... And thank you, I appreciate that. That makes a lot of sense. And my second qu- part question, if this, if this vulnerability exists, why do you think we haven't seen it, uh, exploited?

50
00:09:29.148 --> 00:09:39.888
Or, or, or why do you think big miners haven't, you know, used this to their advantage? Uh, big miners have been do- not doing a lot of optimization.

51
00:09:40.608 --> 00:09:51.748
Uh, th- there is many things that pools could be doing to reduce the stale rates, that reduce, uh, the pro- block propagation time that they have done.

52
00:09:51.908 --> 00:10:03.508
But most, most of it has been done by open source developers in, in the past that were just providing the public network with the resources to reduce pro- block propagation time, and the pools just adopted it.

53
00:10:03.848 --> 00:10:21.528
But there is many things like so for instance, they could upgrade to Stratum V2, uh, to communicate with the hashers, which does reduce latency, which, which removes one of the main vulnerability that they expose themselves, uh, having the hash rates stolen, and they just don't do it.

54
00:10:21.648 --> 00:10:39.448
Uh, we have seen also irrational behavior from some mining pools that had vulnerabilities that were well known, where you could just send a specific mes- message on the pe- peer-to-peer network to one mining pool, and they would waste 30 seconds mining on a fake block hash.

55
00:10:39.968 --> 00:10:52.588
This is massive. The... And that was one mining pool that has 15% of the, of the hash rate of the network. So we have seen that mining pools today have not been the most optimizing.

56
00:10:53.348 --> 00:11:07.948
But it doesn't mean that es- especially as the block subsidy decreases exponentially, that they may not be incentivized to start optimizing more in the future or be replaced by other pools that do optimize better.

57
00:11:08.268 --> 00:11:22.548
So I think we should fix the incentives of the system before we start seeing such evil optimizations. Yeah. It sounds like, uh, it's really just a minor skill issue. Um, so, uh, so this fits in.

58
00:11:22.588 --> 00:11:39.568
You said there are fixes, and the reason why I, you know, we're, we're you, you're leading this demonstration is kind of really lead- it just leads into the fix that you are, uh, spearheading on this called The Great Consensus Cleanup.

59
00:11:40.068 --> 00:11:53.808
Can you give me a short TLDR of that and, like what it is, why it does? How do you explain this to, like the normal listener? Yes. So I think the, the rational and the motivation is one- is the one that I just described.

60
00:11:54.268 --> 00:12:16.088
There has been longstanding bugs, uh, vulnerabilities in the Bitcoin consensus protocol that are not an existential threat to Bitcoin today.But—and there's four of them and the consensus cleanup proposal, which is now BIP fifty-four addresses these four issues.

61
00:12:16.768 --> 00:12:22.698
Uh, it addresses them, uh, in a better way that was initially proposed.

62
00:12:23.048 --> 00:12:36.408
There has been in-iterations on the proposal to try to make the fix as non-intrusive to, uh, Bitcoin users as possible, and I think we have achieved this. And the motivation is, I guess, just long-term risk mitigations.

63
00:12:36.848 --> 00:12:44.928
You don't want to have security holes in your protocol, even if they are very unlikely to be exploited. Uh, some of them can be catastrophic.

64
00:12:45.308 --> 00:12:55.418
It's like very low likelihood but very high impact, uh, sort of, sort of thing. It's like a plane crash. Planes don't crash often, but when they do, they crash hard.

65
00:12:55.888 --> 00:13:05.088
And that would be the same if such a vulnerability would be exploited on, on Bitcoin, something like the Timewarp vulnerability, for instance, that BIP fifty-four also fixes.

66
00:13:05.248 --> 00:13:18.268
So the proposal is fix for long-term vulnerability in the Bitcoin protocol. So last question before I let you go. You are presenting on this at OPnext next week. Uh, what can we expect?

67
00:13:18.348 --> 00:13:27.728
Just a deeper dive into what you've described here. Um, you've given this presentation before. Um, yeah, just, you know, what are we, what are we expecting? Yeah. I think

68
00:13:28.648 --> 00:13:37.228
I gave the presentation at OPnext about the, um, various bugs that have-- and the various fixes that are proposed by BIP fifty-four, uh, last year.

69
00:13:37.448 --> 00:13:42.088
Uh, I will attend OPnext in New York again this year and speak on this topic.

70
00:13:42.158 --> 00:13:57.728
So I think I want to maybe do a small recap on what we are talking about, but I also want to, I guess, emphasize the progress that has been done and probably the expected next steps from the engineers that are working on this proposal.

71
00:13:58.338 --> 00:14:01.128
And really, we are talking of a software proposal.

72
00:14:01.268 --> 00:14:13.788
So at some point it will have to move from the hands of the engineers that are proposing it into the hands of the Bitcoin users, which is why I'm trying to do s-such things as the demo because we knew, we knew about this bug for a long time.

73
00:14:13.828 --> 00:14:21.188
We didn't have to do a demo on Signet. We're just doing it to try to popularize. Well, I've got my Signet node running.

74
00:14:21.228 --> 00:14:32.137
I haven't monitored too closely, but you're doing-- This is the first of, I believe, three demonstrations- Yeah...you're doing, so I'll be keeping track, and maybe I'll throw out some tweets on observations I've had.

75
00:14:32.228 --> 00:14:46.328
Um, otherwise, best of luck, Antoine, on the rest of the day, and excited to see user reaction as the demos continue. So thank you so much for coming- Cool...on to Blockspace. Thanks for having me. See you guys.

76
00:14:46.748 --> 00:14:58.908
See you around. Always something lurking around the corner of the next block, you know? [chuckles] Yeah. Let's go to Iran. Yeah. Not, not physically- No...just in the conversation. Hopefully not.

77
00:14:58.988 --> 00:15:06.788
We're not, uh, Citrini Research. We're not gonna send analyst number three. Don't ask about what happened to analyst number one and two now. Yeah. [chuckles] Okay.

78
00:15:06.968 --> 00:15:17.988
So some context for this, and I'll go ahead and read the headline. I, um, Iran demands crypto fees for shipping pass-passing Hormuz during ceasefire.

79
00:15:18.068 --> 00:15:26.068
So for those of you who haven't been paying attention, Iran and the US and Israel reached a ceasefire agreement in the late hours last night.

80
00:15:26.278 --> 00:15:37.538
Uh, a little bit slippery because apparently strikes are still ongoing from U-uh, from Iran to Isra-Israeli and Gulf State targets. So I'm not really sure how long this will shake out.

81
00:15:38.148 --> 00:15:41.828
Not a geopolitical strategist though, so I don't have to. That's the great thing.

82
00:15:41.848 --> 00:15:53.948
But the Financial Times published this this morning in the wake of the ceasefire being announced that Iranian officials are asking for Bitcoin so that ships can clear the Strait of Hormuz.

83
00:15:54.028 --> 00:16:03.708
Now, Hormuz has become a choke point for oil trying to leave the Persian Gulf, and this choke point has then really siphoned a lot of the...

84
00:16:03.748 --> 00:16:17.728
or choked out a lot of the energy resources and exports, imports rather, that many nations that are dependent on foreign imports of oil need to actually keep the lights on, you know, to keep their houses warm, et cetera.

85
00:16:18.988 --> 00:16:36.988
And it's become a central point for the entire conflict, and in the ten points that Iran drafted, uh, reportedly to send to the US and Israel for negotiating points, one of the key points there is that they want to have control, continued control over the Strait of Hormuz.

86
00:16:37.238 --> 00:16:45.368
And it seems like they're going to start by trying to levy a toll on ships that are passing through in Bitcoin.

87
00:16:45.508 --> 00:17:00.238
Quoting directly here from the Financial Times, uh, Hamid Hosseini, a spokesperson for Iran's Oil, Gas and Petrochemical Product, uh, Products Exporters Union, told the Financial Times on Wednesday that Iran wanted to collect tolling fees from any tanker passing and to assess each ship.

88
00:17:00.828 --> 00:17:12.928
Quote, this is directly from Hosseini, "Iran needs to monitor what goes in and out of the strait to ensure that these two weeks aren't used for transferring weapons," he said, um, whose industry association works closely with the state.

89
00:17:13.388 --> 00:17:19.158
Continuing, "Everything can pass through, but the procedure will take time for each vessel and Iran is not in a rush," he added.

90
00:17:19.708 --> 00:17:37.528
So what this basically looks like is they are telling shi- they are telling shippers, they're telling freight captains they need to email the Iranian government, tell them what their cargo is, and then they have to send a payment in Bitcoin for a dollar for every barrel of oil.

91
00:17:37.648 --> 00:17:46.688
So that means for a supertanker that can hold two million barrels of crude, that would be two million dollars to pay the troll toll to get through the Strait of Hormuz.

92
00:17:48.408 --> 00:17:56.248
And obviously they wanna use Bitcoin because you-- it can't be stopped. There are no bank rails. There's no central party.

93
00:17:56.638 --> 00:18:07.608
There's no centralized source that could end up blocking those payments from going to the Iranian government. And that's really important to contextualize because Iran has been under the yoke of Western sanctions for,

94
00:18:08.708 --> 00:18:14.668
I wanna say almost a, a decade, maybe longer at this point. It's been a long time that they've been under Western sanctions.

95
00:18:15.108 --> 00:18:32.468
This has-Given way to something of, I wouldn't call it thriving, but Iran, but Iran's Bitcoin industry, or rather its Bitcoin adoption rate is probably higher than you would expect from a nation like that, because Iranians had turned to Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as a way to skirt sanctions.

96
00:18:32.838 --> 00:18:35.948
When I was a reporter at Bitcoin Magazine, I spoke to an Iranian

97
00:18:37.018 --> 00:18:57.098
citizen who was a vocal, a very vocal and outspoken pro- protester against the Iranian government, who said that he would use Lightning to buy, uh, PlayStation Network credits, uh, 'cause there's no other way for him to buy, uh, PlayStation Network credits for his PlayStation other than using the Lightning Network, and Bitcoin, and a VPN to purchase them off of something.

98
00:18:57.198 --> 00:19:08.107
I don't know if it was Bitrefill or another service like that. So Bitcoin has had some rate of adoption in the country as a way to skirt these sanctions and get around them.

99
00:19:08.618 --> 00:19:15.848
So it's, kinda makes sense, although it's still pretty astonishing to see a government official, or rather a, a private sector,

100
00:19:17.578 --> 00:19:25.998
a private sector actor who works closely with the government say, "This is what we're gonna do. We're going to take Bitcoin in exchange for pass, safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz."

101
00:19:26.458 --> 00:19:38.748
Now, the one question I do have with this, before I toss it over to you, Charlie, is if the sanctions still exist, which they do, what... where does that put Western shipping companies?

102
00:19:39.138 --> 00:19:49.578
Because they technically, they, they still, this is still the law of the land, right? They're not allowed to transact financially with Iranian entities, be they private or public. So will Western nations

103
00:19:50.718 --> 00:20:02.258
give them some leeway if they do end up paying this toll to get through? Or will they then be under legal threat from their own countries for interacting with a sanctioned entity in Iran?

104
00:20:02.998 --> 00:20:07.278
I think that's kind of a looming question that, to me, was the first thing I thought about when I saw this.

105
00:20:07.308 --> 00:20:19.258
I was like, "Okay, well, that's great for, like, Eastern countries that don't care, or, you know, uh, Asian countries that might not be, you know, uh, subject to the same sanctions that Europe and America are, uh, that they levied against Iran."

106
00:20:20.298 --> 00:20:28.808
What are these other nations gonna do that are actually subject, or what are these other shipping companies going to do whose nations have levied sanctions against Iran? Are they just gonna have to

107
00:20:29.778 --> 00:20:34.088
basically do a q- uh, uh, like, do a coin toss? Say, what would you rather have?

108
00:20:34.118 --> 00:20:46.978
Would you rather get, you know, bombed by the Iranian military and navy, or would you rather face, you know, maybe some scrutiny legally from your home country? Yeah, like, that's the big question.

109
00:20:47.038 --> 00:20:59.878
I mean, there's so much to unpack here that's really, really fun, and the Bitcoiners have, uh, we've got a nice decade of talking about what this might look like.

110
00:21:00.518 --> 00:21:08.098
Um, it's been a popular thing to imagine what it would look like for oil to settle in Bitcoin. Now, this is not

111
00:21:09.058 --> 00:21:23.438
oil settling in Bitcoin, this is a fee to transport oil, uh, that you can, that technically the Iranian government says crypto. But, like, okay, let's be realistic here. Are they gonna be paying in Eth or Solana?

112
00:21:23.518 --> 00:21:34.218
Probably not. Um, are they gonna be paying in stablecoins, which are probably the, you know, from a, from a unit standpoint, the more desirable 'cause you can peg it to the US dollar.

113
00:21:34.278 --> 00:21:53.238
But most stablecoins, the big ones at least, uh, do, far enough down the stack, actually have, like, domiciled, like, entities in the United States, and, like, need to purchase US Treasuries, which means they gotta have access to US, um, you know, financial rails.

114
00:21:53.278 --> 00:22:02.758
In the US, if there is one country you can't send money to, it's Iran. So, like, what are they, you know, what are they gonna do, pay in a stablecoin? I think it's really kinda just Bitcoin.

115
00:22:03.478 --> 00:22:14.038
Bitcoin, you know, for, if you're, if you're watching this clip, and you kinda stumbled across it, you're not, like, a crypto person. Why Bitcoin as opposed to, like, another asset like gold?

116
00:22:14.118 --> 00:22:27.418
Well, Bitcoin you can send digitally. Once that transaction is confirmed, you cannot reverse it, and then it doesn't have to pass through any centralized intermediaries in order to get into the account of the recipient.

117
00:22:27.998 --> 00:22:42.578
Like, just the idea that you could, uh, from your shipping vessel or from the office that owned your shipping vessel, get email, get a Bitcoin address, send $200,000 in Bitcoin, five or six Bitcoin,

118
00:22:43.538 --> 00:22:52.438
to an address so you can pass your vessel through, and, like, nobody has to go in between that, that's incredibly powerful. That's the whole reason Bitcoin exists.

119
00:22:53.118 --> 00:23:05.478
Now, the devil, the devil's in the details, 'cause, like, [laughs] you know, we know the latency of communication. First you have to send an email, which is kind of hilarious in the first place. Yeah.

120
00:23:05.738 --> 00:23:16.218
[laughs] Then you have to send your Bitcoin. [laughs] Do you imagine the subject line, like, "Free passage, please"? Yeah. You know? [laughs] "Attention, uh, to whom it may concern- To whom it may concern-...

121
00:23:16.438 --> 00:23:26.298
come, come ready at all"... here's 20 Bitcoin. Don't bomb us. Yeah. I, it's like, [laughs] the, you know, g- [laughs] it's like, "I swear, bro," like, "the transaction, here's the mempool at Space Link.

122
00:23:26.878 --> 00:23:41.928
Um, please don't shoot us down." Or imagine, like, a slow block or you get the fee rate wrong, and, you know, the Bitcoin's not con- um, confirmed. There's this hilarious, um, tweet from Clemente, uh, [laughs]

123
00:23:42.938 --> 00:23:55.028
showing strips, uh, ships in the Strait of Hormuz while they wait 45 minutes for the Bitcoin transaction to go through, and it's that clip of the Mexican standup from The Office, uh, [laughs] because it's- Yeah. Yeah.

124
00:23:55.028 --> 00:24:10.138
A- and, you know, I'm, I'm glad that you mentioned the confirmation times because one of the quotes in the article says, this is from Hosseini, quote, "Once the email arrives and Iran completes its assessment, vessels are given a few seconds to pay in Bitcoin."

125
00:24:10.158 --> 00:24:15.768
What does that mean? What does that mean? Right? Y- a few seconds. Is it like, "All right," like, "timer's on now.

126
00:24:15.938 --> 00:24:23.354
If you don't pay, we're, you know, you can't pass through," or, "We're gonna bomb you," or something?You know, like you said,

127
00:24:24.274 --> 00:24:30.314
at least ten minutes on, on the heavier end, maybe forty-five or an hour if you have a really slow block.

128
00:24:30.634 --> 00:24:44.224
I mean, obviously there are zero confirmations, and, and, and if they see that it's in their mempool- Yeah, but are you gonna, are you gonna take a zero-conf tr- transaction for two hundred thousand dollars in, like, the most geopolitically tense, uh- I mean-...

129
00:24:44.224 --> 00:24:54.744
environment? Maybe. I mean, it's not like, you know... I, I guess my point is either, one, the person monitoring doesn't know enough to know how that works, and two- Yeah...

130
00:24:54.814 --> 00:25:09.254
I mean, could you imagine, like, a Maersk ship pays and then, you know, does a replace-by-fee and says, "Psych," when they're halfway through the, the strait? [laughs] And they end up rugging the Iranian officials.

131
00:25:09.274 --> 00:25:17.514
Uh, I mean- Right... it, it, it is kind of funny to, to game theory that out. But on a, on a more serious note, looking at what this means,

132
00:25:18.654 --> 00:25:37.994
according to the Financial Times, and these are estimates based on, I would assume, industry data and also transponders for the ships, which the transponder data is not very reliable because a lot of ships have turned off their transponders for security reasons as they've been stuck in the strait for the past, gosh, over a month at this point.

133
00:25:38.134 --> 00:25:48.414
But the, the Financial Times estimates that there's around a hundred seventy-five million barrels of crude and refined products currently loaded onto a hundred and eighty-seven tankers in the Gulf.

134
00:25:49.314 --> 00:26:03.014
Other industry executives estimate that in total, I don't know what the difference between this, the previous number and these numbers are, but these industry estimates ex- ex- executives estimate that there are three hundred to four hundred ships waiting to exit the Gulf,

135
00:26:03.954 --> 00:26:12.414
and one of them said it's going to take weeks to get this backlog through. It's basically like a massive traffic jam. I mean, there's no way that you could just clear this in a couple of days, right?

136
00:26:12.454 --> 00:26:22.434
These are massive ships, and they can't all leave at once. But so you're looking at a hundred and seventy million dollars worth of toll fees here for the Iranians if people play ball. Again, it's really

137
00:26:23.534 --> 00:26:31.054
remains to be seen whether or not shippers and shipping companies will play ball. Yeah.

138
00:26:31.064 --> 00:26:47.854
And then, like, e- there's even more edge cases, like, okay, um, about 30 to 40% of the h- of all blocks are produced from American-domiciled entities' pools, and right now, as far as I'm aware, none of them enforce OFAC sanctions.

139
00:26:47.874 --> 00:26:57.654
There was that back and forth. There have been a few of these, you know, considerations over the past several years. But currently, as far as I'm aware, none of them currently, like- None of them do... do that. No.

140
00:26:57.694 --> 00:27:12.414
And yeah, for an abundance of reasons, it kind of is meaningless. But, like, maybe this is a conversation that comes back on the table where the United States says you can't include these Iranian-bound transactions.

141
00:27:12.494 --> 00:27:23.484
J- I can see it happening just because of its, like, prominence on the global stage now. Um, previously, like, how do you... You know, you can blacklist a few hundred addresses on the OFAC list. But, like,

142
00:27:24.674 --> 00:27:35.114
you know, how do you reference the OFAC list if the Iranian government just spins out 400 new, you know, uh, addresses? Because depending on how

143
00:27:36.694 --> 00:27:48.734
deep you wanna go into, you know, Xpubs and different public keys, you know, you can... It, it gets really hard to, like, track this. So- 100%. And super interesting story.

144
00:27:48.874 --> 00:27:58.674
W- one last note on this, just for people who are thinking there's no way this is real. Are the Iranians actually asking for Bitcoin? I mean, it is the Financial Times.

145
00:27:58.694 --> 00:28:04.794
I will say their track record on Bitcoin reporting hasn't been the best, but, uh, this seems like a legitimate scoop.

146
00:28:04.834 --> 00:28:13.914
But just to contextualize how important, or rather how, I would say, quietly essential Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies are to the Iranian regime,

147
00:28:15.034 --> 00:28:25.994
Fox News reported on this this week, and I thought this would, this beared mentioning here on the stream. I'm quoting directly from the Fox News article.

148
00:28:26.054 --> 00:28:37.244
Quote, "Researchers said they detected more than 1,100 active cryptocurrency nodes operating inside Iran." Now, the question for that, for me at least, is how many of those are actually government-affiliated?

149
00:28:37.334 --> 00:28:50.044
How many of those are civilians running their own nodes so that they can make their own transactions and they don't have to worry about being gated out of the Bitcoin network because of firewalls, et cetera, things like that?

150
00:28:50.954 --> 00:29:00.714
R- regardless, though, the point, the, the whole, uh, the headline of this article and the focus of it is that Iran has moved hundreds of millions in crypto during nationwide internet blackout, a report reveals.

151
00:29:01.314 --> 00:29:20.234
So the Iranian regime and Iranians definitely lean on Bitcoin a- as a way to supplement financial flows that they would, uh, that they're blocked away, blocked out of because of these Western sanctions, and I, I just think it, it bears mentioning that there's, there's quite a lot of activity with Bitcoin going on in that country.

152
00:29:21.014 --> 00:29:36.494
You know, I'll, I'll point out, um, a lot, pretty much every one of the, uh, like, nation-state intrigue Bitcoin stories over the past four or five years, really since El Salvador, has been various versions of, is the government gonna buy Bitcoin?

153
00:29:36.754 --> 00:29:41.024
How much is Bitcoin gonna go up? Who's gonna acquire Bitcoin or nation-state mining?

154
00:29:42.034 --> 00:30:06.354
This is a very different type of story because this gets really into the heart of the adversarial nature of Bitcoin that's designed to function when the most powerful country in the world, the United States, is at heads with another nu- you know, nu- soon possibly nuclear-armed country, Iran, and

155
00:30:07.814 --> 00:30:14.974
the whole world is divided around these transactions, and yet Bitcoin still functions. This is not a Bitcoin number go up story.

156
00:30:14.994 --> 00:30:25.334
This is a, does the Bitcoin network function in a nation-state level adversarial, uh, scenario? And I'm gonna bet that it does.

157
00:30:25.934 --> 00:30:37.934
So I would almost, like, hold this as an exampleTo say Bitcoin is thrust under the nation- national stage. And it, it's beautiful that I think it happens at sixty-seven thousand dollar Bitcoin.

158
00:30:38.594 --> 00:30:49.614
Like, it's not a, it's not a-- it-- this is not a bull market right now. So it's not a-- it's not Bitcoin screaming towards two hundred K. It's Bitcoin's now down fifty percent, and it's still, like, front and center.

159
00:30:49.684 --> 00:30:56.994
So, you know, this is a really cool, um, uh, users and function go up for the Bitcoin network.

160
00:30:57.054 --> 00:31:03.114
I think that probably- It's like that, it's like that meme, heartbreaking, the worst person you know just made a good point, not you. Yeah.

161
00:31:03.134 --> 00:31:13.774
But the fact that, you know, one of the more notable and salient examples of Bitcoin being adopted on a nation-state scale is with the Iranian dictatorial regime.

162
00:31:13.784 --> 00:31:20.674
[laughs] I mean, the benefit of that, the, the, the positive is that there are civilians using it. And I'm not gonna ov-exaggerate that.

163
00:31:20.734 --> 00:31:30.234
It's not like everyone is using Bitcoin in Iran, but I've talked to Iranians who do use Bitcoin, and they tell me that it... there, there is at least some level of adoption among civilians there.

164
00:31:30.244 --> 00:31:37.734
But also clearly, the Iranian regime is using it as part of their financing and as part of their monetary regime.

165
00:31:38.794 --> 00:31:49.194
And it is a more, I would say, you know, again, going back to the Yor- the worst person you know made a good point, to me, it is more impactful than the kind of LARPing we saw out of El Salvador.

166
00:31:49.934 --> 00:32:01.564
The, the whole Bitcoin as the tender thing was, I guess, cool. It made splashy headlines, but the wallet that they rolled out for it, for civilians, Chivo, did not really work very well.

167
00:32:02.054 --> 00:32:08.794
People would report paying a lightning invoice, and then it didn't get satisfied, and then their Bitcoin was gone out of their lightning wallet.

168
00:32:08.804 --> 00:32:13.984
There were all of these UX and UI bugs, and they eventually ended up, I think, reneging on it, right?

169
00:32:14.094 --> 00:32:24.374
I think the IMF basically said, "If you want loans, you have to drop the Bitcoin as legal tender thing," and so it's no longer even a thing over there. Um, also, I do think that there's kind of a...

170
00:32:24.384 --> 00:32:32.434
It's, it's a weird ethical question, like forcing people to take this payment of, of, you know, take this method of payment that most people, a lot of people barely know how to use.

171
00:32:32.474 --> 00:32:42.984
A lot of people who actually own Bitcoin barely know how to use it. So, but yeah, we'll, we'll leave that there with one last note, though. Bitcoin is above seventy-one thousand right now.

172
00:32:43.034 --> 00:32:54.754
Markets are rallying on news of the ceasefire. So let's keep that, let's keep that going. Let-let's- Yeah. Let's keep the vibes going. Let's keep that going. Yeah. We want number to go up. Yeah.

173
00:32:54.854 --> 00:33:07.794
No more doomsday tweets from our president, commander-in-chief. Please. [laughs] Those... No, yeah. Those are... I, I... Please let me turn off notifications on Truth Social. It's my least favorite notification to get.

174
00:33:07.914 --> 00:33:17.394
Um- Yeah, a hundred percent. But also, it does, it g- does pull you out of bed at 5:00 in the morning Central Time. Yeah. And I'm, "Oh, what the heck did he just say? [laughs] Oh, my God." Yeah.

175
00:33:17.614 --> 00:33:28.714
I, I, I think the, uh, the loose cannon charisma, or rather the charm of the loose cannon charisma of our, of our president is, is, is I think wearing off even among his most ardent supporters.

176
00:33:28.834 --> 00:33:41.534
But we'll leave that there. We won't wade too far into the realm of politics. We got another story here in a second, but not before a word from our sponsor, CleanSpark. [gentle music] We are CleanSpark,

177
00:33:42.454 --> 00:33:58.494
America's Bitcoin miner, a publicly traded company with the largest operating hash rate, powered entirely by self-operated infrastructure across four states. This is our proof of work.

178
00:33:59.374 --> 00:34:09.874
We are setting the standard for what's next. Learn more about the intersection of energy and Bitcoin at cleanspark.com. All right.

179
00:34:09.954 --> 00:34:18.674
And with that, we will move on to our next story, the long-awaited launch of Morgan Stanley's Bitcoin ETF.

180
00:34:19.194 --> 00:34:30.874
So Morgan Stanley rolled out MSBT, the first spot Bitcoin ETF from a major US bank, as Unchained's headline here reminds us. Now, a few high-level notes on this.

181
00:34:30.934 --> 00:34:39.394
This was announced, or rather the news broke a few months back when Morgan Stanley filed for this ETF.

182
00:34:40.414 --> 00:34:48.254
It's listed on the New York Stock Exchange, Arca Exchange, and it is, once again, the first US bank to issue a Bitcoin ETF.

183
00:34:48.393 --> 00:34:52.614
Now, if you're confused about that, you know, BlackRock, Fidelity, these aren't banks in the traditional sense.

184
00:34:52.634 --> 00:34:59.114
They are asset managers, and I'll get into why those were some of the first movers within the Bitcoin ETF space here in a minute.

185
00:34:59.734 --> 00:35:07.874
But this is the first US bank, not just the first major US bank, the first US bank at all to issue a spot Bitcoin ETF, and it's going to have the lowest management fees on the market.

186
00:35:08.394 --> 00:35:13.154
It's, uh, zero point fourteen percent, so fourteen basis points.

187
00:35:13.534 --> 00:35:26.954
That is well below IBIT's, BlackRock's Bitcoin ETF, at twenty-five basis points, zero point two five percent, and below, just below Grayscale's, which was the lowest on the market at fifteen basis points.

188
00:35:28.014 --> 00:35:35.374
Now, a lot of people heralded this as more important a-almost than the Bitcoin ETFs being approved in the first place.

189
00:35:35.444 --> 00:35:44.094
Maybe that's exaggerating it, but a lot of commentators have said this is at least on par with that milestone for Bitcoin.

190
00:35:44.114 --> 00:35:52.274
Part of the reason for that is Morgan Stanley has sixteen thousand wealth management advisors who manage nine point three trillion in client assets. So

191
00:35:53.194 --> 00:36:08.874
you already have this massive war chest of client assets, and if you're Morgan Stanley and you're starting to advise one, two, three percent into Bitcoin, that's a substantial chunk of that nine point three trillion.

192
00:36:08.914 --> 00:36:20.554
They've offered Bitcoin ETF trading from third-party ETF issuers for some years. This is their first entrance into the actual ETF issuing space, though. Coinbase will be providing custody.

193
00:36:20.614 --> 00:36:32.783
BNY Mellon will do cash custody and administration. Now, going back to why now and why are we just getting the first bank, I, I...

194
00:36:32.814 --> 00:36:46.438
That was kind of the question that I was most curious about with this.So I, I interfaced with our LLM overlord, specifically Claude- [laughs]... and asked, asked Claude what- why is this, why is this such a big deal?

195
00:36:46.998 --> 00:36:55.198
What's the really the difference between an asset manager and a bank issuing an ETF? Why are the banks, or rather a bank just now getting to it?

196
00:36:56.518 --> 00:37:01.858
[sniffs] And the, the key points it came out with was the first one was regulatory structure and culture.

197
00:37:02.498 --> 00:37:14.678
Quote, "Banks like JP Morgan are regulated by the Fed, OCC, and are subject to bank holding company rules, so they face much stricter capital requirements than their counterparts in asset management and regulatory scrutiny around crypto exposure.

198
00:37:15.378 --> 00:37:23.338
Asset managers are primarily SEC regulated, which is a more permissive environment for launching investment products." This is partly why asset managers got there first.

199
00:37:23.678 --> 00:37:35.558
The regulatory route was a little bit easier for them. But also there's the business model incentive to factor into account. Asset managers make money purely on fees. They offer you some exposure to some sort of asset.

200
00:37:35.628 --> 00:37:43.298
They manage your assets for you. They take a little cut off the top of that. So a B- a Bitcoin ETF's pretty straightforward for them. It's like, yeah, this is what we do for everything else.

201
00:37:43.378 --> 00:37:52.718
We have ETFs for a lot of commodities. This is a natural extension once we get regulatory clarity and once, you know, institutions and retail are, are comfortable enough with these assets.

202
00:37:52.758 --> 00:37:58.898
Once they've matured enough, we can go ahead and offer them. A bank, though, uh, the, that, that equation's a little more complicated.

203
00:37:58.938 --> 00:38:10.058
They have wealth management clients, prime brokerage, custody, trading desks, all of these different interests, and the Bitcoin ETF sometimes complements or competes with those, so they needed to figure out how to structure it first.

204
00:38:10.178 --> 00:38:14.558
Um, and the, uh, last few, distribution and client base.

205
00:38:14.958 --> 00:38:25.298
Morgan Stanley's, uh, uh, wealth management arm is geared towards high net worth and ultra high net worth clients, and for a long time, they were cautious about offering crypto even to those clients.

206
00:38:25.938 --> 00:38:35.278
Um, whereas BlackRock, uh, you know, they had much broader reach for their ETF through retirement accounts, retail brokerage, institutional things, et cetera.

207
00:38:36.478 --> 00:38:46.718
And then there's also the reputational and risk tolerance aspect of it. Like banks have a lot more reputational risk. An asset manager like BlackRock, you know, they can kinda go in. People expect them to have...

208
00:38:47.398 --> 00:38:53.398
to, to give them a- exposure to assets that might be a little riskier, but banks, you know, it's where you store your money. You don't want to lose your lunch.

209
00:38:53.478 --> 00:38:59.028
You want to trust your bank, make sure they're making sound decisions, so there's more reputational risk involved for banks as well.

210
00:38:59.798 --> 00:39:12.218
Uh, and then there's a custody element to it, but it's a little too subtle for this, so, um- [clears throat] I'll, I'll tap in 'cause I can't speak too much to, you know, wealth managers versus investment banks.

211
00:39:12.278 --> 00:39:25.458
But I can say the custody, they're custody with Coinbase Custody. For those of you not in the know, of the ETFs, I believe everyone uses Coinbase Custody. That's the BlackRocks. That's the BitWises, except for Fidelity.

212
00:39:26.198 --> 00:39:36.678
Um, so Fidelity does their own custody, so not surprised that Morgan Stanley's gonna be using Coinbase Custody. Uh, I am kinda curious, Colin, like given that, um,

213
00:39:37.618 --> 00:39:52.218
Morgan Stanley's ETF has the lowest fees, I mean, they're half of BlackRock's, will we see like intra-ETF flows to the, you know, the, the, the less costly product? You know, I don't know this business enough.

214
00:39:52.398 --> 00:40:03.938
We might actually, uh, um, uh, pop this question on, uh... We might, we might hit this question, uh, w- uh, to our next guest, Jay, here in a second to see if he has any insight.

215
00:40:04.698 --> 00:40:07.517
Um, but anyway, yeah, Morgan Stanley, it's great.

216
00:40:07.598 --> 00:40:25.258
They were, they were very prominently and conspicuously fading Bitcoin, fading broader crypto, uh, for a long time, and here they are coming out big with like the, uh, biggest institutional news, I believe, in a long time.

217
00:40:25.818 --> 00:40:32.298
Uh, 100%, and they also will be launching retail crypto trading on E-Trade, which they now own, sometime in 2026.

218
00:40:32.958 --> 00:40:46.398
So obviously these two product launches were incubated in tandem with each other, and it makes sense that they, one would follow the other. Definitely big news. Uh, enough to get us back into more bullish territory?

219
00:40:46.498 --> 00:40:58.018
Probably not, but just another example of Bitcoin's increasing institutional adoption, even if it's slower than a lot of people would like. We're gonna wrap that story up.

220
00:40:59.098 --> 00:41:06.898
We'll bring up Jay from Ligos here in a sec, but not before we shout out our friends and sponsors of the show, Luxor.

221
00:41:07.018 --> 00:41:14.258
This episode is brought to you by Luxor's Commander, Bitcoin miner management software built for enterprise operations.

222
00:41:14.878 --> 00:41:29.948
Commander gives you real-time fleet monitoring, bulk remote commands across your fleet, and Intelligent Miner, an automated profitability engine that runs every five minutes, adjusting power settings to live hash rate and energy markets.

223
00:41:32.498 --> 00:41:37.698
ERCOT back tests show over 10% more profitability versus binary mining.

224
00:41:38.338 --> 00:41:55.778
Commander Pro is $100 per megawatt or a 25% basis pool fee added, that's roughly half the price of your competitors, and comes with a 60-day free trial. Get started today at luxor.tech/commander.

225
00:41:56.718 --> 00:42:12.518
And without further ado- We will bring- Let's bring on our next guest, friend of the show, Jay from Ligos. Welcome back, Jay. Hey, how you guys doing? Pretty good, man. Thank you for joining us again.

226
00:42:13.578 --> 00:42:21.558
For those of you who just- Let me- Oh, go ahead. Let me hit you with a question. You were listening to our co- conversation about ETFs. We're kind of the blind leading the blind here.

227
00:42:21.638 --> 00:42:30.238
You know more, you know your way around this more. What are your thoughts? Like, what's your take on the Morgan Stanley ETF? I think the, the...

228
00:42:30.498 --> 00:42:41.238
So from what I've read about it, the fees are much lower, which I think is, it was almost necessary because, um... and, you know, I know you mentioned it, but Morgan Stanley's got a huge wealth management business.

229
00:42:41.278 --> 00:42:50.094
They've got a bunch of, you know, uh, bank-You know, they've got a huge advisory business where they have high net worth clients, and they have advisors who, you know, allocate them into various products.

230
00:42:50.174 --> 00:43:08.474
I think there was this sense that, oh, if Morgan Stanley launches an ETF and the fees are not lower, and said advisors shovel their clients' monies into s- the ETF, it's not a great look 'cause, like, you know, why are you gonna, why are you gonna put them in Morgan Stanley's ETF if IBIT or, you know, other, other ETFs are charging less?

231
00:43:08.594 --> 00:43:15.594
Um, so I think from that perspective, because I think the primary buyer of the ETFs are actually their wealth channel, they had to charge less.

232
00:43:16.274 --> 00:43:20.074
Um, but I mean, I think that space is just gonna continue to see compression.

233
00:43:20.134 --> 00:43:42.954
Like, you know, if you think about the custody fees, like the reason that Coinbase is able to charge so little, and I think in some of the cases none, like I think it's public that maybe there was a custody fee waiver for, for IBIT and others, is just, you know, they can make the money on the trading, you know, the flows in and out of the ETF and, you know, all of the, uh, spot activity that happens around that is more than enough for them.

234
00:43:43.614 --> 00:43:58.234
Um, but it is kind of a longer term concern if all of the ETFs... Like I know Fidelity's the custodian for their ETF. I know Anchorage is a secondary custodian for a few, but by and large, they're all Coinbase.

235
00:43:58.554 --> 00:44:11.434
And I mean, I don't know. There, uh, there is like a weird kinda concern there if all of these new bank products and asset management products are all just Coinbase custody underneath. Yeah.

236
00:44:13.074 --> 00:44:23.194
Concentration risk on concentration risk. If it's not Bitcoin mining pool concentration risk, it's asset manager concentration risk. But we won't be talking too much about that.

237
00:44:23.314 --> 00:44:33.534
We will be touching on private credit once again, and I appreciate you double-tapping on this subject with us, Jay, because it's at the heart, private credit is at the heart of

238
00:44:34.974 --> 00:44:44.354
the AI CapEx boom that we cover a lot here, and in fact, it is the fun- it, it's the flow of funds working in the background I think most people take for granted or don't really know how it works.

239
00:44:44.374 --> 00:44:53.114
And, and we're starting to see maybe some troubling signs and, and you're gonna give us the fact versus FUD on whether or not people need to start worrying right now.

240
00:44:53.194 --> 00:44:59.384
I wanna start though with Moody's giving negative ratings to these so-called business development companies.

241
00:44:59.434 --> 00:45:07.624
Now, business development companies are publicly traded vehicles that will extend loans to smaller mid-sized businesses that have trouble accessing credit markets,

242
00:45:08.554 --> 00:45:18.104
and, you know, so in- investors who want to have exposure to private credit, which can be high return but also high risk, will, you know, buy these BDCs.

243
00:45:18.434 --> 00:45:26.734
But Moody's just rated BDCs negatively for the first time in two years. Can you unpack what this is saying and why this is happening now? Yeah.

244
00:45:26.874 --> 00:45:38.714
So I think the primary, you know, reason if you kind of look under the hood for the, for the Moody's D rating was the investor exodus, as they called it, you know, everyone trying to pull out their capital.

245
00:45:38.834 --> 00:45:53.874
Um, and I think the, the, the thing that underlies this, you know, we discussed private credit briefly last time I was on here, but, uh, th- the story under the story that not a lot of folks are talking about is the fact that private credit only really works because there's bank leverage.

246
00:45:54.014 --> 00:46:02.994
So if you think about pre-'08, most of these loans were just made by banks. Like the private credit industry wasn't as big because it didn't need to be as big.

247
00:46:03.134 --> 00:46:11.694
You know, all these middle market companies could get loans from a bank. Um, you know, with regulatory changes and capital requirements, a lot of that has shifted to private credit.

248
00:46:11.724 --> 00:46:27.914
The way the banks play a role now is instead of lending to the end company or, you know, a infrastructure project or whatever, they lend to the private credit fund who's making the loan, and the private credit fund, you know, posts their loans as collateral so, you know, they can get a turn of leverage.

249
00:46:28.534 --> 00:46:34.614
Um, and I think what Moody's rightfully called out is like a lot of these BDCs are already near their leverage limits, right?

250
00:46:34.734 --> 00:46:40.154
So like if people want their money back, it's not like they can borrow more money from the bank to give them their money back.

251
00:46:40.214 --> 00:46:56.074
They're gonna have to sell some assets or they're gonna have to do something to get new investors interested in putting assets in, which, you know, seems fairly unlikely right now, um, which, you know, which is why I think, you know, the, the negative outlook stands.

252
00:46:56.134 --> 00:47:03.323
You know, I think the one thing that would swing things around is if all of a sudden there was some new flow of capital into the space. Um,

253
00:47:04.534 --> 00:47:14.384
and I guess, you know, that kind of segues into this, uh, repainting of the narrative that all of these managers have tried over the past couple months, which is like, "Oh, we're not lending to software companies.

254
00:47:14.414 --> 00:47:24.374
We're lending to hard assets, you know, the heavy assets, low obsolescence. We're lending to industrials and manufacturing." It's really just data centers mostly, but yeah.

255
00:47:25.934 --> 00:47:28.574
So just I wanna double tap on something really quickly.

256
00:47:28.614 --> 00:47:41.074
Are you saying that the reserve requirements post 2008 have taken a lot of these banks out of these credit markets, and that's why it's shifted over to these private credit funds? Or did I, did I mix that up? No, no, no.

257
00:47:41.174 --> 00:47:47.714
I think directionally, yeah, that like the, the capital requirements for these banks to make these kinds of loans just made it so that it's not economical.

258
00:47:48.294 --> 00:48:01.194
Um, and I actually think that it's like, you know, I, I think Bitcoiners like to just, "Oh, everything that goes wrong in TradFi, it's doom and gloom, like the impending collapse of the financial system, and we're all gonna be sending SATs to each other from now on."

259
00:48:01.234 --> 00:48:06.014
And like, you know, maybe one day we will, but I don't think this is that.

260
00:48:06.134 --> 00:48:17.694
Like the banks are not in like a systemic risk position because they are now lending to the funds which have their own equity capital who are making these loans. And so, uh, you know, you...

261
00:48:18.014 --> 00:48:23.474
At worst, maybe these banks, you know, if these, there's massive drawdowns, all the equity gets wiped out. The banks see

262
00:48:24.474 --> 00:48:32.393
a couple billion, you know, maybe even if it's $100 billion in losses, like that's like, you know, a couple days of printing money. Like there's no systemic risk here.

263
00:48:32.814 --> 00:48:45.034
But yeah, basically a lot of this activity shifted to, uh, you know, like the, let's say, unregulated private credit segment. And it's... Oh, go ahead, Charlie. Go ahead. Oh, you, you go ahead.

264
00:48:45.094 --> 00:48:47.594
I have a, I have a dumb question. Okay.

265
00:48:47.654 --> 00:49:15.694
So but it's also attracted companies that I think that you wouldn't expect to be playing in these markets, and one of those are insurers, insurance companies.I think that people typically, if they think at all about where insurance companies are earning yield on their cash to make sure that they have enough to pay back their obligations, if anything, if people are ever thinking about that, which I don't know how many people are, they're probably thinking that they have it in pretty liquid assets or something that is more or less pretty safe.

266
00:49:16.054 --> 00:49:18.734
I think most people would probably assume bonds, you know.

267
00:49:18.774 --> 00:49:33.164
But a lot of these insurers actually have, some might call it overexposure to the private credit market, and they're starting to ha-- There, there are some headlines now that are going back to the jitters saying that they might be over their skis with some of these funds.

268
00:49:33.994 --> 00:49:39.614
You know, going back to the fact versus FUD, how much stress are we seeing from insurers right now within the private credit markets?

269
00:49:40.634 --> 00:49:51.234
I, I, I do think this is probably the one interesting piece of this that could shake out either way. So, uh, as a quick background, you know, we're not talking about like your auto insurance, right?

270
00:49:51.294 --> 00:50:02.554
These are mostly like life insurers or term insurance, uh, companies. Um, so if you think about the last ten years, private credit kind of sees this take off. They're getting all these assets, making loans.

271
00:50:02.654 --> 00:50:10.474
It's great for the managers because they get to charge fees on assets. But if you wanna make more money, like, you know, like every business, you wanna grow your business, they wanna grow their business.

272
00:50:10.514 --> 00:50:13.393
How do they grow more their business? They need to bring in more capital.

273
00:50:14.214 --> 00:50:24.704
Um, insurance, you're right, historically has always invested in kind of very liquid or relatively liquid instruments, um, you know, publicly traded bonds, things of that sort.

274
00:50:25.064 --> 00:50:34.394
And you kind of think of insur-- like insurers are a bank in a sense. You know, people put in money, they buy policies, and there's an expectation of a payout in the distant future.

275
00:50:34.414 --> 00:50:39.754
And in the meantime, the insurance company does safe stuff with the money to make sure that they can meet the payouts that they have.

276
00:50:40.394 --> 00:50:58.454
Um, so, you know, these managers decided, you know, if I'm Apollo or I'm KKR or another private credit manager, you know, a great idea would be for me to buy an insurance company, stuff the insurance company with private credit products that I am also managing and taking fees on, and then I get kind of money on both ends.

277
00:50:58.554 --> 00:51:07.914
Um, and I don't think it was like fraudulent by any means, like these were rated vehicles, but a bunch of the money that went into private credit over the last, you know, ten years has been from insurance companies.

278
00:51:08.033 --> 00:51:15.614
Um, and you know, if there is kind of significant decline in the value of these assets, then that could be in trouble for insurance companies.

279
00:51:16.214 --> 00:51:24.714
Um, and the other thing you gotta keep in mind with insurance companies is like a lot of them are not US regulated in the way that like banks are.

280
00:51:24.834 --> 00:51:30.274
Um, you know, there's much less transparency in terms of the assets that insurance companies hold.

281
00:51:30.543 --> 00:51:39.294
A lot of them are regulated in places like Bermuda, which, you know, I think is still strong regulation, but, um, it's not the level of transparency that we get from banks in the US.

282
00:51:39.374 --> 00:51:46.494
So it's kind of hard to see how levered these insurance companies are and what their exposure really is. Yeah.

283
00:51:46.594 --> 00:51:57.584
I'm having trouble sharing it right now, but going back to what you were saying about the exposure here, we have this Financial Times graph that you linked to us, largest private credit managers forge partnerships with insurers.

284
00:51:58.094 --> 00:52:08.314
It shows the estimated share of credit assets funded by insurers at top seven North American-listed private capital groups. Apollo is over sixty percent. KKR is nearly sixty percent.

285
00:52:08.434 --> 00:52:22.054
Blackstone is just over forty percent. Carlyle is at forty percent. Brookfield is almost at forty percent. Ares is fifteen, eighteen percent. Blue Owl at the lowest at about ten percent. That's a huge chunk. And

286
00:52:23.054 --> 00:52:31.274
my question going back-- O-one of my follow-up questions on this, and I'll kick it to you, Charlie. Going back to what you were saying about these pr- these private credit

287
00:52:32.314 --> 00:52:36.594
issuers saying, "No, no, no, these aren't software companies. These are infrastructure companies.

288
00:52:36.634 --> 00:52:44.554
We're backing data centers," which is mostly true, but I, I think that one of the fears is that might downplay the risk on the ROI for these things.

289
00:52:45.134 --> 00:53:00.714
Because there is this fear that the CapEx spend for the AI builds has just been so munificent and so large that there's no way that, that this capital could be recouped within even the next decade.

290
00:53:00.974 --> 00:53:09.114
I, I, I recall a report, I think from JPMorgan or, or Morgan Stanley a while back, where it was like an absurd number.

291
00:53:09.154 --> 00:53:20.174
It was like something like five hundred, three hundred billion or something would only net a like ten to twenty or twen- ten to fifteen percent return on the, the, uh, CapEx for some of these data center builds worldwide.

292
00:53:20.874 --> 00:53:34.644
A-all of that to ask, long-winded way of asking you, do you think that the actual ratings for these private cre- for this debt is too high for what, what, what, what people are actually putting their money into? Like,

293
00:53:35.774 --> 00:53:44.414
are these AI builds probably less safe than some of the private credit funds were making them out to be? I think espec- I think so.

294
00:53:44.454 --> 00:53:53.454
You know, I think you've seen the Oracle CDS charts, I'm sure you guys have discussed them, where, you know, Oracle CDS is trading at two thousand and eight levels, basically.

295
00:53:53.474 --> 00:54:07.274
And the idea is basically that investors don't think that Oracle will meet all of these obligations because they've committed to so much CapEx for building out data centers for OpenAI, and I think the idea is like, will OpenAI meet their commitments in terms of spend with Oracle?

296
00:54:07.914 --> 00:54:17.014
Um, and I think the same is true across like all these private credit companies. You know, if you go back to the original, I think Blue Owl did a, a placement with Meta for data centers.

297
00:54:17.094 --> 00:54:25.094
I think that was the first one, you know, maybe mid last year. Um, the rates are-- You know, they're-- The spreads are almost too low.

298
00:54:25.124 --> 00:54:37.454
Like in my mind, I'm thinking that, you know, if you think AI is this revolutionary thing that's gonna upend the entire economy, and that's why there's gonna be so much demand for these data centers, why are you okay getting seven percent on the-- or, you know, eight percent?

299
00:54:37.494 --> 00:54:40.454
And like it's, it's just not enough return for the amount of risk.

300
00:54:40.694 --> 00:54:58.614
Especially because, you know, in my mind, um, like the way that, uh, they're, they're modeling things out is basically that there's gonna be so much demand for these data centers, um, that the data centers will produce enough cash flow, and they'll be able to meet the payments on these loans.

301
00:54:59.114 --> 00:55:07.348
But if they don't, yeah, there's physical assets. It's better than software. You know, they have-Infrastructure, power agreements, GPUs, all of that.

302
00:55:07.518 --> 00:55:17.398
But like GPUs without demand or a data center without customers doesn't produce cash flow, and there's always the risk that like, you know, there's delays, something happens, and you don't get paid.

303
00:55:17.658 --> 00:55:31.258
And I don't know if that's completely priced in. Um, the other thing that I'm like hesitant to, uh, think about there is just like, you know, if you are a credit investor, you're inherently short volatility.

304
00:55:31.458 --> 00:55:39.058
Like when you make a loan, the best outcome is you get your money back and the borrower pays you the interest. Like there is no upside, right?

305
00:55:39.658 --> 00:55:46.838
So like credit investors, historically, you've been inherently been like, you know, they are, they are, um, long the status quo.

306
00:55:46.938 --> 00:55:51.378
You want the world to stay the same today for the next five years until you get your loan paid back.

307
00:55:51.478 --> 00:56:00.298
And, you know, um, every story you guys have discussed, whether it's AI or Iran or geopolitics, whatever, like the world is changing a lot.

308
00:56:00.418 --> 00:56:11.598
Um, and I think in that world it's a lot tougher to be a credit investor just because, you know, your assumption that- You can't price, you can't price the uncertainty. You have no idea. Yeah. Right? Exactly. Um.

309
00:56:11.638 --> 00:56:20.278
Especially when you don't have a share in the upside. Right. Sorry, Charlie, I lied. I have one more question just because- Go ahead... you said something that's like the perfect segue for my last question.

310
00:56:20.338 --> 00:56:30.998
You said that for, I believe you said for Blue Owl or for, for Oracle's debt, um, from Blue Owl for its data centers, its credit, the credit default swaps on that are reaching two thousand and eight levels.

311
00:56:32.378 --> 00:56:44.758
That's, that seems pretty, pretty frightening, uh, you know, to people who were around and who knew what happened with the credit default swaps in two thousand and eight. And so when I hear that, alarm bells go off.

312
00:56:45.138 --> 00:56:51.998
D-do you think that private credit is the tip of the spear for a market downturn then? Is that... Do you think that signals that or is that an overblown concern?

313
00:56:52.818 --> 00:57:01.258
Uh, I don't think it's the tip of the spear, e-especially 'cause the Oracle one was a little separate, right? So the Oracle CDS is for bonds that Oracle has issued.

314
00:57:01.278 --> 00:57:20.618
And I don't know if, you know, if you remember, I don't know, maybe it's been a year plus at this point, when there was that whole press conference that Trump had and they're gonna build Stargate in Abilene, Texas, and Oracle's gonna be putting a bunch of money into it, and OpenAI is gonna spend five hundred billion dollars, I think it was, over the next ten years or something, maybe less.

315
00:57:20.638 --> 00:57:22.538
But like insane numbers.

316
00:57:22.558 --> 00:57:32.538
And Oracle's stock just, stock just went up and to the right until people were more like, "Okay, who are the customers that are going to pay Oracle these hundreds of billions of dollars over the next couple of years?"

317
00:57:32.558 --> 00:57:38.627
You know, if Oracle's fronting the cash or borrowing the cash from lenders to build all of this, then someone's gotta pay for it in the end.

318
00:57:39.298 --> 00:57:51.638
And I think the concern is really like all of this hinges on basically four companies, right? It's, um, Meta, Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic. Like those are the customers of all of these data centers.

319
00:57:51.718 --> 00:57:52.778
That is the GPU demand.

320
00:57:53.058 --> 00:58:04.538
So you are making the implicit bet that they will have enough demand that they will be able to, you know, that their customers will pay them enough so that they can pay you enough, you being Oracle, so that you can pay your lenders enough.

321
00:58:04.578 --> 00:58:12.278
And I think there's just a lot of assumptions in that chain. I wouldn't say it's like impending doom.

322
00:58:12.498 --> 00:58:17.238
Like I think it's, you know, it is the, the CDS is at two thousand and eight levels, but I think Oracle is very levered.

323
00:58:17.298 --> 00:58:27.978
Like, I think their play on the AI story was, "We're just gonna build data centers and kind of pick up on the AI trend." Um, you know, I think that's not the position that all the other hyperscalers are in.

324
00:58:28.018 --> 00:58:43.018
They actually have, you know, meaningful cash from other businesses, but the CapEx numbers are big. We have a comment on YouTube, uh, from JHY says, "It's the new Abilene paradox." I think that's a pretty funny take.

325
00:58:43.078 --> 00:58:59.078
Okay. J, my dumb quest- my dumb kinda question is, um, you know, when the two thousand and eight happened, nobody, nobody knew any of the words or the lingo. Nobody knew what credit default swaps or whatever they...

326
00:58:59.458 --> 00:59:12.878
Nobody's, nobody knows what they are still to this day. But over this weekend, I had a normal person ask me what I thought about the private credit market. And I was like, "You are in an unrelated profession.

327
00:59:12.998 --> 00:59:22.537
You don't... Like you, you saw some news story." I'm like, this, this, this, this story seems to now be crossing into normie territory. Do you get this idea?

328
00:59:22.717 --> 00:59:27.418
Do you think the average person is equipped to even like analyze these types of financial news at all?

329
00:59:28.558 --> 00:59:56.858
Um, so I, I, uh, probably not, but I will say the one interesting th- like look, I am y- you know, uh, like I'm, I'm very much in the camp that this is not like systemic collapse, but I think the one interesting thing in this whole story has been like s- un- probably with the exception of COVID, since two thousand and eight, there's been no story where there's just been consistent bad news week after week after week for a prolonged period of time, right?

330
00:59:56.898 --> 01:00:05.278
Like we had blips, you know, you had like the, the run up in rates, you know, in twenty-two and twenty-three, the whole inflation story.

331
01:00:05.308 --> 01:00:12.538
You know, there was some macro headwinds in like, you know, twenty seventeen, twenty eighteen, but it was never like, you know, you saw one story and then it was gone, right?

332
01:00:12.678 --> 01:00:23.278
Or like, you know, everyone's like, "Oh, there was like a bad treasury auction or something." But this has just been like, you know, story after story, different companies, different managers, different problems, right?

333
01:00:23.338 --> 01:00:32.958
So in that sense, I think it's kind of permeated, but I do still think that like, you know, the private credit market as a whole is like two trillion dollars. Um,

334
01:00:34.038 --> 01:00:44.878
if you think about like a trillion of that being equity and like, you know, certain dro- like even if you assume worst case, there's like three hundred billion dollars of losses to banks, that's not a ton in the...

335
01:00:44.978 --> 01:00:53.278
I know it's a big number, but it's not a ton in the grand scheme of things. So, um, you know, the one, the, the, the one kind of unknown is maybe the insurance thing that you guys were mentioning.

336
01:00:53.358 --> 01:00:57.598
Like, you know, that's a little opaque and what is the exposure for insurers, you know?

337
01:00:57.638 --> 01:01:09.246
People don't withdraw from their policies often, but if they think that their insurers are not good for the money, maybe they will, um, and, and that could be an issue, but yeah.Yeah, we'll have to see.

338
01:01:09.486 --> 01:01:18.766
I think to-- for me, it's one of the things to keep an eye on, and hopefully not the end of the world, but definitely something to keep track of as we plow through twenty twenty-six.

339
01:01:18.866 --> 01:01:36.866
Jay, CEO, Ligos Finance, thank you so much for joining us, man. Hope you have a good week. Likewise. Take care, guys. Cheers. See you around. And with that, we will do a quick ad read from our sponsor, Ligos.

340
01:01:37.286 --> 01:01:48.246
Hey. You could easily, uh, you know, maybe throw in a little private credit mention into this ad read, but we'll just keep it kosher and- Do an ad read. [chuckles] Yeah. Hedge funds are getting liquidated.

341
01:01:48.746 --> 01:02:00.666
Is your Bitcoin safe? It's not just Bitcoin's price drying up. Big whales, hedge funds, and lending desks are reeling after the notorious October 10th and February 5th liquidations.

342
01:02:01.046 --> 01:02:12.076
Counterparty risk is rampant, so it's more important than ever to understand who controls your Bitcoin, and with Ligos, you control your Bitcoin. Don't be the next FTX or Celsius victim.

343
01:02:12.106 --> 01:02:24.226
If you're working with another loan provider, do yourself a favor before it's too late and check out Ligos Finance. They are our preferred Bitcoin lending provider. It is all self-custodied lending.

344
01:02:24.266 --> 01:02:34.836
They use Bitcoin smart contracts to help you protect your stack and make sure that no one has control of your keys except for yourself. With Ligos, you always know where your Bitcoin is.

345
01:02:34.866 --> 01:02:48.876
No wrapping, no bridging, no rehypothecation. Get competitive rates for as low as ten percent APR. Go to ligos.finance to learn more. All righty. And with that- Let's talk about ASIC chips. Yeah.

346
01:02:48.906 --> 01:03:00.446
We are doing, we're doing a tour de force of, like, every type of Bitcoin story here. It-- You know, just wanna pat ourselves on the back. Yeah. We, uh, the- Crypto, code, trade, tech. Yeah.

347
01:03:00.486 --> 01:03:13.366
It's a very eclectic show run today, all of the sundry headlines. And for this one, our friends at Bitdeer are back in the news with the launch of their A4 SealMiner series.

348
01:03:14.026 --> 01:03:19.606
Now, for those of you who don't know, Bitdeer is a publicly traded Bitcoin miner that is transitioning into AI.

349
01:03:20.346 --> 01:03:32.666
They sold all of their Bitcoin recently to aid in the CapEx spend for that transition, but they also are novel in the sense that they are a publicly traded Bitcoin miner that actually produces the picks and shovels to mine Bitcoin.

350
01:03:32.686 --> 01:03:44.046
They have their own ASIC miner manufacturing line known as SealMiner. Of course, Jihan Wu, the CEO of Bitdeer, formerly a co-founder and the CEO of Bitmain.

351
01:03:44.506 --> 01:03:49.106
So if there was any company that was going to do this, try to give Bitmain a run for its money, it was going to be Bitdeer.

352
01:03:49.846 --> 01:04:00.906
But things have changed a lot since Bitdeer started rolling out its ASIC line, and we'll touch on this later in the segment after we get to some of the high-level notes for this.

353
01:04:00.946 --> 01:04:13.096
But you gotta wonder, with all of these Bitcoin miners pivoting to AI, is the ASIC arms race a losing race for whoever's competing at this point? And again, we'll touch on that in a second.

354
01:04:13.106 --> 01:04:15.586
But just a few key notes for this.

355
01:04:16.566 --> 01:04:29.626
The Seal04 chip has a headline power efficiency of thirteen point five joules per terahash, and they also have come out with not just an air-cooled model for this, [clears throat] but also two hydro models.

356
01:04:30.066 --> 01:04:40.426
The Ultra Hydro model has nine point four five joules per terahash. Joules is synonymous with watts, by the way, y'all. I'm actually just gonna go ahead and start using that 'cause joules is kind of confusing.

357
01:04:40.506 --> 01:04:46.086
No one uses that. A-a-and this, the Ultra Hydro model comes out at eight hundred and eighty-six terahash a second.

358
01:04:46.146 --> 01:04:58.826
The Pro Hydro is ten point nine watts per terahash at six hundred and eighty terahash a second, and the A4 Pro Air is ten point nine joules per terahash at thirty-three point six terahash per second. So,

359
01:05:00.306 --> 01:05:10.746
a few more notes on this before we get into kind of larger commentary for the ASIC manufacturing space. This rollout is actually coming late.

360
01:05:11.366 --> 01:05:32.986
As we covered on Blockspace at the turn of the new year, Bitdeer was actually under fire from one investor in a class action lawsuit that claims that Bitdeer was misleading about their timeline for the, uh, for the A4 SealMiner series.

361
01:05:33.606 --> 01:05:44.266
Now, what this lawsuit basically-- what this lawsuit charges against Bitdeer is that they were misleading about the timeline for the rollout for this.

362
01:05:44.286 --> 01:05:56.846
Bitdeer first announced the Seal04 ASIC chip as part of the SealMiner roadmap in June 2024, advertising it as, quote, "as low as five joules per terahash or five watts per terahash energy efficiency."

363
01:05:57.986 --> 01:06:08.786
A-and they said that the chip was expected in Q2 2025. That is from a Bitdeer presentation that was cited in the lawsuit. Now, things did not shake out this way.

364
01:06:09.126 --> 01:06:25.266
Bitdeer ended up actually delaying the launch, and in its Q3 earnings call, it said that it was going to have a Q4 2025 tape-out and Q1 2026 mass production for the SealMiner A4 series with a six to seven joule per terahash efficiency.

365
01:06:25.346 --> 01:06:39.986
Now, that is at the chip level for the Seal04, so we didn't get to that efficiency for the full shoeboxed unit for these things 'cause, you know, the fans, uh, the control board, other equipment on the miner increases its energy load.

366
01:06:41.406 --> 01:06:49.426
But it also said that it is aiming for a five joule per terahash target in a second round of the SealMiner A4 series.

367
01:06:49.466 --> 01:06:59.346
So this is the first round, closer to that six to seven, and then it's saying that they want to do another one with the five joule per terahash target in a second round of the Seal4, uh, SealA4.

368
01:06:59.606 --> 01:07:09.126
So all that being said, this is coming a little bit later than s- than Bitdeer probably would have hoped. But that being saidHow much does that really matter?

369
01:07:09.266 --> 01:07:21.466
Because now all of these public Bitcoin miners, the largest customers for these ASIC manufacturers are pivoting towards AI, including Bitdeer itself. Now, the cool thing about Bitdeer is they have optionality.

370
01:07:21.476 --> 01:07:29.606
They produce the ASICs, so they can either mine with them themselves, they have extensive mining operations, or they can sell them into the open market.

371
01:07:29.626 --> 01:07:44.166
But Bitdeer is also moving into AI, so are they actually going to want to allocate rack space or megawatts towards this if they can repurpose that space for AI compute? Almost certainly not.

372
01:07:44.206 --> 01:07:53.996
And so my question then becomes, i-i-- how, how big is this rollout for Bitdeer? How many machines are they actually producing of the A4 series? What was their tape out?

373
01:07:54.026 --> 01:07:57.946
You know, it's my understanding, and they're working with TSMC, I'm pretty sure.

374
01:07:57.976 --> 01:08:10.286
My understanding is if you're going to TSMC, the greatest semiconductor manu- fabrication company in the world, you really kinda have to up the ante each time to make sure that you keep your spot in the queue for a, an ASIC chip tape out.

375
01:08:10.746 --> 01:08:16.056
Because there's just so much demand that otherwise you're just gonna get kicked out, and they're saying, "You're small potatoes, we're not gonna worry about you."

376
01:08:16.546 --> 01:08:25.986
So I'm curious how big this production run will be, how many machines will they actually produce, and what will they actually do with them? I mean, obviously, they will replace their older machines with them.

377
01:08:26.046 --> 01:08:36.146
How long will they actually mine with them, though, if they are chasing this kind of AI golden rabbit? The other question too is, will they actually be able, if they wanted to, to sell them in the open market?

378
01:08:36.746 --> 01:08:46.506
I'm not totally convinced because ASIC prices are low, low, low. And Charlie, I'm almost done here, and then I will shut up.

379
01:08:47.246 --> 01:09:04.966
But if we-- we're looking at data from our friends at Luxur's hash rate index, as of yesterday, the most-- the newest machines or the tranche that they indexed for the newest machines, anything under nineteen watts per terahash are trading at four point thirteen dollars per terahash,

380
01:09:06.246 --> 01:09:15.526
which is insanely low. Um, just to give you an idea, so if you have like a, a two hundred terahash S21, y-you can get one of those things for under a grand.

381
01:09:15.566 --> 01:09:26.326
You can get it for like eight hundred bucks according to this right now. So there's very little demand in the ASIC market currently. And as we see, demand has fallen off a cliff. This year, it's wow, look at this.

382
01:09:26.386 --> 01:09:30.626
This is crazy. Starting in February, it just absolutely tanks.

383
01:09:30.686 --> 01:09:43.206
I assume that's because of the introduction of newer models into the system, or maybe there's just, you know, something broke in the ASIC market as all of these public Bitcoin miners are selling their machines on the secondary market.

384
01:09:44.046 --> 01:09:55.585
Last note on this, Bitdeer is not the only company that has launched an ASIC manufacturing line in an attempt to jockey for market share with the largest manufacturers, Bitmain and MicroBT.

385
01:09:57.026 --> 01:10:03.186
F- uh, Valora, formerly Ordyne, also started its own ASIC manufacturing line.

386
01:10:03.226 --> 01:10:12.666
This was one of the more trumped-up entrants to the ASIC manufacturing business when they announced their attempt to build ASICs back in, I believe, twenty twenty-three.

387
01:10:12.726 --> 01:10:23.706
They had a bunch of funding, tens of millions of dollars from Marathon, from Mara, and they did launch a-- their Teraflux line. Ordyne has ASICs out in the wild.

388
01:10:23.886 --> 01:10:35.966
Mara purchased some, and I believe they are operating them. But now the company has pivoted to Valora, and they're not really making the ASIC miner a feature of their product suite anymore.

389
01:10:36.346 --> 01:10:51.426
If you go to their landing page, they say Valora is, quote, "innovative AI solutions driven by ultra-low power technology." But they're making AI part of their pitch now. They're no longer focusing on Bitcoin mining.

390
01:10:51.466 --> 01:11:02.926
And then obviously, there's another newer entrant Block with their Proto miner. Be curious to see what their plans are now that the industry is churning towards AI. That was a lot.

391
01:11:03.646 --> 01:11:15.846
I'm gonna shut up and toss it over to you, Charlie. Yeah. It seemed like we were having, you know, for years the, the narrative in, in Bitcoin has been like, how do we, you know, Bitmain's this dominant

392
01:11:17.066 --> 01:11:33.906
almost monopoly, now more of like an oligopoly. You know, there's been competitors. Now, those competitors are dialing things down. Like, man, is it just gonna be the Bitmain story again?

393
01:11:35.026 --> 01:11:46.706
Is this a broader trend that we could see something like this happen at Bitmain? I mean, who knows? So this is a very interesting trend we'll have to see. Yeah.

394
01:11:46.746 --> 01:11:56.066
And going back to Bitmain, last thing I'll say on this, it's also unclear what they're going to do in the future. Yeah. There, there have been rumors that they are phasing out air-cooled entirely.

395
01:11:56.146 --> 01:12:09.966
We have not been able to confirm those rumors, but I've heard it enough times to think that there might be a case for that, especially considering Bitmain has been really trying to push their hydro line for the last few generations of, of Bit- uh, of antminers that they've rolled out.

396
01:12:11.126 --> 01:12:22.226
So they, they might be going to only hydro, and then that really does raise the question, well, I mean, are, are miners going to just move over all their infrastructure to hydro to get new machines?

397
01:12:22.266 --> 01:12:33.626
Are we going to enter this limbo period where Bitcoin's hash rate doesn't really increase that much because a lot of the largest miners are decommissioning machines and moving towards AI?

398
01:12:34.346 --> 01:12:46.186
Um, the miners who are still around don't wanna make the CapEx spend for, you know, dry coolers and hydro setups, so they just stick with older generation hardware. You know, th-there's this,

399
01:12:48.466 --> 01:12:55.686
you know, there's this general feeling, or at least, you know, historical wisdom would say Bitcoin's hash rate is up and to the right.

400
01:12:56.186 --> 01:13:02.506
And I mean, I don't think that it's going to necessarily shrink over any meaningful period of time or over the midterm.

401
01:13:02.526 --> 01:13:21.150
But y-you do have to wonder over the next few years how much Bitcoin's hash rate will grow given all of these headwinds against it.It's-- Yeah, it seems to me that we can actually put a much better ceiling on the hash rate projections for the foreseeable future.

402
01:13:21.810 --> 01:13:35.910
That's really just limited by the foundry space, like how much tape outs are we gonna have, and that is your absolute upper boundary for hash rate, so- I mean, uh, it's hard not to be a little bit bullish as a miner right now, I think.

403
01:13:35.950 --> 01:13:43.300
I mean, Bitcoin's kind of... Like, its price is in the toilet, but you have to be thinking that can it really get... I mean, it can get that worse.

404
01:13:43.390 --> 01:13:46.890
Bitcoin could get cut in half, and then your profitability is cut in half as well.

405
01:13:47.510 --> 01:14:01.010
But if I'm a Bitcoin miner that has low enough power costs right now and I have new enough equipment, I'm probably feeling a little comfy because y-y-you have to think there's probably not that much room for difficulty to edge up right now, so-

406
01:14:01.990 --> 01:14:12.090
But yeah- You're- I'm, I'm-- Yeah, if I'm a miner, I'm probably flat on difficulty for a long time. You know, be very-- don't expect difficulty to go up. And then also,

407
01:14:13.310 --> 01:14:26.490
you know, we see this industry whipsaw back and forth. Um, I will make a big observation, which is it's probably way easier to convert an AI build into a Bitcoin mining build than a Bitcoin in-build into an AI build.

408
01:14:27.130 --> 01:14:41.670
So, like, you know, if, if the whipsaw happens, it could happen really fast the other way. So, you know, in that case, the hash rate could be very good to own because we, you know, there is a bottleneck. Um,

409
01:14:42.730 --> 01:15:00.450
however, if Bitcoin doesn't go up, we have another problem on our hands. So, let's move on to our last and final story of the day, which is another publication.

410
01:15:00.480 --> 01:15:09.720
Another major publication has figured out who Satoshi is. We have heard this story before. We've heard it multiple times before. The New York Times,

411
01:15:10.730 --> 01:15:26.130
a reporter for The New York Times did a long, uh, investigation deep dive into who Satoshi could be, and they came up with the answer. It is British cryptographer Adam Back.

412
01:15:26.270 --> 01:15:42.309
Yes, the conclusion from, uh, John Carreyrou [laughs] points to- This is insane though... Adam Back. Yeah, I mean, we've heard this story a bunch before. Um,

413
01:15:43.590 --> 01:15:52.350
I like to kind of chuckle, brush it off, point fingers at trad fi- you know, traditional media and go, "Oh, come on, we've heard this a million times before."

414
01:15:52.890 --> 01:16:03.270
But I think you wanted-- I think, Colin, you may have wanted to maybe cave fade this a little bit where we ta- you know, where you, where you, uh, actually, um, point to

415
01:16:04.350 --> 01:16:15.249
the fact that this guy did a little more legwork, I think, than your average, say, Financial Times or average reporter. Uh- Yeah... and it does bring up some good, some good points.

416
01:16:15.290 --> 01:16:25.860
First of all, shout out to John Carreyrou, the journalist who wrote this, for sharing a gift article on X. Doing the Lord's work, man. I really appreciate that.

417
01:16:25.870 --> 01:16:29.630
[laughs] I did not wanna have to re-up a New York Times subscription.

418
01:16:29.640 --> 01:16:48.990
There's some meta commentary here, though, before I get into the evidence that the reason that he dove into this, he was already interested in this topic, but a year ago, or i-in the, in the fall of twenty twenty-four, we actually covered this on Writers Room, for those of you who have been OG Blockspace fans back in the day when it was still Bitcoin Season Two.

419
01:16:49.030 --> 01:16:55.830
We covered the HBO documentary that claimed that Peter Todd, Canadian Bitcoin developer Peter Todd, was Satoshi.

420
01:16:56.510 --> 01:17:11.990
Anyway, our intrepid journalist here, John, did not find the evidence that convincing, so he decided to do his own research after watching the HBO documentary. And the thing that tipped him off to looking into Adam Back,

421
01:17:13.150 --> 01:17:25.690
and I will say this is very, I think, to me at least, a little specious. He says that he was-- Adam Back, as part of the documentary, was interviewed in Riga, Latvia, I assume during Baltic Honey Badger.

422
01:17:26.570 --> 01:17:32.770
Quoting directly from the article here, "The filmmaker casually rattled off the name of several Satoshi suspects. At the mention of his own name, Mr.

423
01:17:32.990 --> 01:17:43.730
Back tensed up, strenuously denied he was Satoshi, and asked that the conversation be kept off record." Having encountered my fair share of liars and developed something of an expert- [laughs]...

424
01:17:43.840 --> 01:17:52.500
taste in their tells, this is like the equivalent of someone being like, you know, um, ornithologist here when they're on, on bird Reddit or something- [laughs]...

425
01:17:52.530 --> 01:17:57.790
or someone tw-tweets something about birds, you know, and th- when they're making an appeal to their authority.

426
01:17:58.150 --> 01:18:07.530
I don't know what encountering your fair share of liars means other than just living in reality because people are not always honest. But- It's 'cause he works for the media. He works- [laughs]

427
01:18:08.350 --> 01:18:16.360
He works for the elitist l- coastal, coastal elites, you know, who write for The New York Times. Okay. Pr-probably true, but he said that, "Mr.

428
01:18:16.610 --> 01:18:25.200
Back's demeanor, his shifting eyes, his awkward chuckle, the jerky movements of his left hand struck me as fishy. When the credits rolled up, I replayed the sequence several times on my TV." And that,

429
01:18:26.440 --> 01:18:47.850
that is the jumping off point for John Carreyrou to- I, I, I'm imagining, I'm imagining in a dark room, and it's, you know, three AM, and he's, like, bleary-eyed, and he's, and he's, you know, doggedly like a detective, uh, going through the evidence, and he just pauses at the critical climactic moment one-third of the way into the film, and he, and he figures out, and he rewinds, and he plays it over and over and over again.

430
01:18:47.910 --> 01:18:57.109
I mean, we're just imagining that. [laughs] Yeah. Right. He's like, "Wait, there it is." Yeah. The Leonardo DiCaprio from- Yeah... Once Upon a Time in Hollywood pointing at the TV. Exactly.

431
01:18:57.730 --> 01:19:16.282
But so he spends a year researching this, and a, and, and as far as I can tell, the bulk of the analysis, or rather the bulk of his evidence really rests on linguistic analysis, looking at Satoshi's writings on Bitcoin talk-And in the white paper versus Adam Back's own writings in Bitcoin talking on X.

432
01:19:16.382 --> 01:19:23.302
I'm gonna share a few of those findings here because I, I will say I'm not convinced that, that this is a smoking gun.

433
01:19:23.902 --> 01:19:29.402
I do think that some of the evidence though is at least worth pointing out because it seems like it could be directionally correct.

434
01:19:30.242 --> 01:19:38.082
One of them is over 100 words and phrases from Satoshi's writing match Back's usage on X and mailing lists, including rare terms like partial preimage.

435
01:19:38.802 --> 01:19:49.042
I don't really think that that would count, that, that's more of a technical term. Um, burning the money, okay, and abandonware. I don't actually know what abandonware is.

436
01:19:49.142 --> 01:19:56.102
That- That's the other thing is a lot of these- A lot of these com-- abandonware is common, a common term. It's for- Yeah... yeah, software that nobody maintains anymore.

437
01:19:56.222 --> 01:20:10.242
So that's one reason why I did wanna bring this up is this is-- those might be rare to people who are not tech literate or people who are not cypherpunks, but th- those are things that you would see thrown around pretty commonly, I think.

438
01:20:11.142 --> 01:20:19.982
Um, both use two spaces between sentences. I thought this was funny. An outdated habit suggesting an author over 50. Okay, that could be a lot of different people.

439
01:20:20.222 --> 01:20:34.702
Uh, Back shared 67 of Satoshi's exact hyphenation errors, nearly double the next closest suspect's 38. Both alternated inconsistently between e-mail, e with a dash mail, and email all one word.

440
01:20:35.202 --> 01:20:46.662
Check spelled the British way versus check spelled the American way, and British and American spellings of things like optimize, so using the Z versus the S back and forth. I could see that. You know, I could see that.

441
01:20:46.742 --> 01:20:53.802
Yeah. Both confused it's with its possessive versus, um, plural, and ended sentences with also.

442
01:20:54.822 --> 01:21:07.642
Back was the only person among 620 mailing list candidates to match all of Satoshi's key writing quirks simultaneously according to th- according to this article, and Back denied ever using the word bloody, but the authors found it in a 1998 post where he did.

443
01:21:07.702 --> 01:21:08.962
I don't know why that matters.

444
01:21:09.002 --> 01:21:26.742
The one thing though, the circumstantial evidence that I think is interesting is Back was conspicuously silent on the cryptography mailing list during the entire period Satoshi was active, late 2008, 2011, despite being a prolific contributor before and after, yet later claims he had participated in those discussions.

445
01:21:26.782 --> 01:21:36.962
To me, this is one of the actually the more- That's a good, that's a good point... this is one of the more compelling pieces of evidence because, uh, Adam Back's Hashcash is cited in the white paper.

446
01:21:37.482 --> 01:21:51.502
Adam Back, as the New York Times article points out, had made a lot of the connections that Satoshi seems to make in terms of combining these cryptographic, uh, these cryptographic functions to create Bitcoin early on i- in some of his writings in the '90s.

447
01:21:52.722 --> 01:21:54.562
I'll get into that in a second.

448
01:21:54.602 --> 01:22:19.742
But this idea that the man who, who's cited in the white paper, who has talked about decentralized money, who is very fluent in the, the jargon, and also is well read up on the research and white papers of the time to try to create something like a decentralized money, the fact that he would be missing from the cryptography mailing list during Bitcoin's bootstrapping phase and then pop up after Satoshi disappears is very odd.

449
01:22:19.802 --> 01:22:27.342
You'd have to think that he would be involved in the early days. He would-- Certainly he would've known about Bitcoin. He was on the cryptography mailing list.

450
01:22:27.362 --> 01:22:33.222
He would've seen Satoshi's emails in the cryptography mailing list with the white paper talking about bootstrapping the network.

451
01:22:33.902 --> 01:22:46.982
So I, I find that to be one of the odder aspects of this story, that one of the f- founding fathers, you know, if you're gonna have the Mount Rushmore of Bitcoin, right? Adam Back would be up there for Hashcash.

452
01:22:47.682 --> 01:22:57.102
The fact that he would be missing from the discussion from the onset for or from the outset makes no sense to me. That is a very good point.

453
01:22:57.422 --> 01:23:11.542
Um, so we do have to at least point out that the reporter did some legwork, kinda m- mixed bag on, I think, like, how, like, re- you know, how compelling some of the data is.

454
01:23:11.622 --> 01:23:29.202
But there are, there are some conspicuous connections. Um, but I'll bring up, uh, Adam has consistently denied unilaterally that he is Satoshi every time that he's been asked as far as I'm aware.

455
01:23:29.842 --> 01:23:47.782
Um, and, uh, I'll just say that my subjective observate-- observations on, uh, on, um, Adam Back is that just really since then he hasn't done things that, like, Satoshi would do it seems.

456
01:23:47.862 --> 01:23:59.382
Like, you know, he's been, he's been prominent in the discussion, but pretty low-key from a, like, like, heavy-handed protocol, like, proactivity standpoint.

457
01:23:59.842 --> 01:24:08.082
He's always had opinions, but he's not, you know, like, he doesn't like... You would-- Like, you know, someone who is Satoshi would probably be a lot, uh, stronger willed on some of these points.

458
01:24:08.402 --> 01:24:13.642
Okay, but that's subjective. Here is Adam's response to that, um, to this article.

459
01:24:13.962 --> 01:24:22.962
Adam says, quote, "I'm not Satoshi, but I was early in laser focus on the positive societal implicat- implications of cryptography, online privacy, and electronic cash,

460
01:24:24.262 --> 01:24:34.462
hence my 1992 onwards active interest in applied research on e-cash privacy tech on cypherpunks mail list, which led to Hashcash and other ideas."

461
01:24:34.942 --> 01:24:41.142
Um- So- And he goes on One thing I would add, you know, of course he would deny it if it's true.

462
01:24:41.262 --> 01:24:49.692
I'm not saying it is true, but as one of our listeners here, JHY8557 says, "Poor guy's gonna get kidnapped now thanks to The New York Times."

463
01:24:49.722 --> 01:25:01.382
Yeah, and I think that is, like, kind of the ethical question and problem about this. If you do try to dock Satoshi, you're putting a, a million Bitcoin target, up maybe a million Bitcoin.

464
01:25:01.422 --> 01:25:09.042
We don't actually know how many coins Satoshi mined and then locked away, but you're putting a target on someone's back.

465
01:25:09.982 --> 01:25:29.012
This was a lot of the uproar over the HBO documentary that claimed it was Peter Todd-You know, there was less of an uproar, but someone did analysis last year about how Jack Dorsey is Satoshi, which I will say the New York Times article is a lot more compelling than the Rube Goldberg evidence that you get from that article where it's like- Oh my God...

466
01:25:29.082 --> 01:25:40.662
it's all this- It's almost like this crazy numerology. Yeah. And, you know, this semantic analysis that looks at, you know, he left all of these Easter eggs and clues that end up matching up, and

467
01:25:41.822 --> 01:25:53.322
it, it's a little bit too much. The, the last thing I'll say about the New York Times stuff, and then we can sign off, but there was a ling- a linguist that did stylometry analysis with Back and 12 other...

468
01:25:53.802 --> 01:26:01.662
and, and, and, uh, 11 other suspects, and said that Backs was the closest to match Satoshi's white paper, although the analyst still called it inconclusive.

469
01:26:02.342 --> 01:26:07.222
So I think if the author here is being honest, even the linguistic analysis doesn't obviously prove anything.

470
01:26:07.822 --> 01:26:22.122
Um, I, I do think there are some compelling points in here, I think one of the better attempts to try to explain who Satoshi is. Not endorsing it, but... Yeah. So, um, this will just be a regular story.

471
01:26:22.172 --> 01:26:33.002
There will always be the media calling someone else Satoshi. What's interesting is like it feels, Colin, like we're getting some bull market stories at the bottom of the bear market.

472
01:26:33.102 --> 01:26:46.822
Like this is a Bitcoin's been screaming upwards type story that you see in like TechCrunch or like, you know, New York Times. But [chuckles] here we are down 50% and we're getting the who is...

473
01:26:46.862 --> 01:27:02.262
You know, we found Satoshi story. So, um, it feels a little different this time. Uh, love to see it. Uh, I'd like to say we'll cover who the media thinks is Satoshi, but

474
01:27:03.602 --> 01:27:19.122
every Bitcoiner knows it's not super great to just speculate endlessly on this because Satoshi clearly does not want to be connected to a real identity. And with that, we're gonna wrap things up.

475
01:27:19.242 --> 01:27:32.602
Thank you for watching Block Space Live, coming at you on Monday, Wednesday, Fridays at noon Eastern everywhere streams are found. This will be a podcast shortly after we wrap up. And

476
01:27:33.962 --> 01:27:49.802
if you haven't already, you can still buy a ticket to our conference in New York, Thursday, April 16th. Up Next, O-P-N-E-X-T.D-E-V. I'm Charlie. This is Colin. We'll see you on Friday.

477
01:27:51.082 --> 01:27:55.242
[outro music]